Drag reduction in large wind turbines through riblets: Evaluation of different geometries

Roger Arndt, Leonardo P. Chamorro, Fotis Sotiropoulos

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Wind tunnel experiments were performed with a wind turbine airfoil that was fitted with different riblet geometries. The foil represents the cross section of a full-scale 2.5MW wind turbine blade close to the tip. The test foil was placed in the free stream flow of the wind tunnel at the Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota. Various sizes and geometries of riblets were tested at angles of attack ranging from 0°≤α≤10°, corresponding to a range of lift coefficient of 0.25≤ CL ≤1.14, and at a Reynolds number of Re=2.2 X 106. Mean drag was measured via a wake survey (momentum deficit) and with a sensitive force balance. Lift was measured directly from the force balance. Tests included the cases of complete and partial riblet coverage on the wing. The results indicate that riblets could provide an overall reduction of skin friction drag, and that the amount of the decrease varied with riblet height and geometry. Partial riblet coverage appears, in some cases, to be more efficient than its complete coverage counterpart. The percentage of drag the riblets reduced varied greatly and in some cases the riblets were even detrimental to the airfoil. The most efficient riblet for a completely covered airfoil was found to be the V-groove shape of 100 μm height. It produced a reduction of roughly 6% in the operational range expected for a turbine airfoil. On the other hand, the most efficient riblet size for partial coverage was also a V-groove shape but had a slightly smaller peak height of 80 μm. This configuration produced a reduction of roughly 4% in the range of angle of attack that is typical for operation in the field. Our testing was limited to one size airfoil. However, comparison of our test data with recent numerical simulations by A-Mayoral and Jimenez suggest that an optimal size riblet configuration can be expressed in normalized form, involving only Reynolds number and the drag coefficient at design angle of attack.

Original languageEnglish (US)
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012
Externally publishedYes
Event50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition - Nashville, TN, United States
Duration: Jan 9 2012Jan 12 2012

Other

Other50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
CountryUnited States
CityNashville, TN
Period1/9/121/12/12

Fingerprint

Drag reduction
Airfoils
Wind turbines
Angle of attack
Geometry
Drag
Metal foil
Wind tunnels
Reynolds number
Stream flow
Skin friction
Drag coefficient
Turbomachine blades
Momentum
Turbines
Computer simulation
Testing
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

Arndt, R., Chamorro, L. P., & Sotiropoulos, F. (2012). Drag reduction in large wind turbines through riblets: Evaluation of different geometries. Paper presented at 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, TN, United States. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-232

Drag reduction in large wind turbines through riblets : Evaluation of different geometries. / Arndt, Roger; Chamorro, Leonardo P.; Sotiropoulos, Fotis.

2012. Paper presented at 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, TN, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Arndt, R, Chamorro, LP & Sotiropoulos, F 2012, 'Drag reduction in large wind turbines through riblets: Evaluation of different geometries', Paper presented at 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, TN, United States, 1/9/12 - 1/12/12. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-232
Arndt R, Chamorro LP, Sotiropoulos F. Drag reduction in large wind turbines through riblets: Evaluation of different geometries. 2012. Paper presented at 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, TN, United States. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-232
Arndt, Roger ; Chamorro, Leonardo P. ; Sotiropoulos, Fotis. / Drag reduction in large wind turbines through riblets : Evaluation of different geometries. Paper presented at 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, TN, United States.
@conference{2447465792c44e3f940f877f758c0376,
title = "Drag reduction in large wind turbines through riblets: Evaluation of different geometries",
abstract = "Wind tunnel experiments were performed with a wind turbine airfoil that was fitted with different riblet geometries. The foil represents the cross section of a full-scale 2.5MW wind turbine blade close to the tip. The test foil was placed in the free stream flow of the wind tunnel at the Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota. Various sizes and geometries of riblets were tested at angles of attack ranging from 0°≤α≤10°, corresponding to a range of lift coefficient of 0.25≤ CL ≤1.14, and at a Reynolds number of Re=2.2 X 106. Mean drag was measured via a wake survey (momentum deficit) and with a sensitive force balance. Lift was measured directly from the force balance. Tests included the cases of complete and partial riblet coverage on the wing. The results indicate that riblets could provide an overall reduction of skin friction drag, and that the amount of the decrease varied with riblet height and geometry. Partial riblet coverage appears, in some cases, to be more efficient than its complete coverage counterpart. The percentage of drag the riblets reduced varied greatly and in some cases the riblets were even detrimental to the airfoil. The most efficient riblet for a completely covered airfoil was found to be the V-groove shape of 100 μm height. It produced a reduction of roughly 6{\%} in the operational range expected for a turbine airfoil. On the other hand, the most efficient riblet size for partial coverage was also a V-groove shape but had a slightly smaller peak height of 80 μm. This configuration produced a reduction of roughly 4{\%} in the range of angle of attack that is typical for operation in the field. Our testing was limited to one size airfoil. However, comparison of our test data with recent numerical simulations by A-Mayoral and Jimenez suggest that an optimal size riblet configuration can be expressed in normalized form, involving only Reynolds number and the drag coefficient at design angle of attack.",
author = "Roger Arndt and Chamorro, {Leonardo P.} and Fotis Sotiropoulos",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2514/6.2012-232",
language = "English (US)",
note = "50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition ; Conference date: 09-01-2012 Through 12-01-2012",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Drag reduction in large wind turbines through riblets

T2 - Evaluation of different geometries

AU - Arndt, Roger

AU - Chamorro, Leonardo P.

AU - Sotiropoulos, Fotis

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Wind tunnel experiments were performed with a wind turbine airfoil that was fitted with different riblet geometries. The foil represents the cross section of a full-scale 2.5MW wind turbine blade close to the tip. The test foil was placed in the free stream flow of the wind tunnel at the Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota. Various sizes and geometries of riblets were tested at angles of attack ranging from 0°≤α≤10°, corresponding to a range of lift coefficient of 0.25≤ CL ≤1.14, and at a Reynolds number of Re=2.2 X 106. Mean drag was measured via a wake survey (momentum deficit) and with a sensitive force balance. Lift was measured directly from the force balance. Tests included the cases of complete and partial riblet coverage on the wing. The results indicate that riblets could provide an overall reduction of skin friction drag, and that the amount of the decrease varied with riblet height and geometry. Partial riblet coverage appears, in some cases, to be more efficient than its complete coverage counterpart. The percentage of drag the riblets reduced varied greatly and in some cases the riblets were even detrimental to the airfoil. The most efficient riblet for a completely covered airfoil was found to be the V-groove shape of 100 μm height. It produced a reduction of roughly 6% in the operational range expected for a turbine airfoil. On the other hand, the most efficient riblet size for partial coverage was also a V-groove shape but had a slightly smaller peak height of 80 μm. This configuration produced a reduction of roughly 4% in the range of angle of attack that is typical for operation in the field. Our testing was limited to one size airfoil. However, comparison of our test data with recent numerical simulations by A-Mayoral and Jimenez suggest that an optimal size riblet configuration can be expressed in normalized form, involving only Reynolds number and the drag coefficient at design angle of attack.

AB - Wind tunnel experiments were performed with a wind turbine airfoil that was fitted with different riblet geometries. The foil represents the cross section of a full-scale 2.5MW wind turbine blade close to the tip. The test foil was placed in the free stream flow of the wind tunnel at the Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota. Various sizes and geometries of riblets were tested at angles of attack ranging from 0°≤α≤10°, corresponding to a range of lift coefficient of 0.25≤ CL ≤1.14, and at a Reynolds number of Re=2.2 X 106. Mean drag was measured via a wake survey (momentum deficit) and with a sensitive force balance. Lift was measured directly from the force balance. Tests included the cases of complete and partial riblet coverage on the wing. The results indicate that riblets could provide an overall reduction of skin friction drag, and that the amount of the decrease varied with riblet height and geometry. Partial riblet coverage appears, in some cases, to be more efficient than its complete coverage counterpart. The percentage of drag the riblets reduced varied greatly and in some cases the riblets were even detrimental to the airfoil. The most efficient riblet for a completely covered airfoil was found to be the V-groove shape of 100 μm height. It produced a reduction of roughly 6% in the operational range expected for a turbine airfoil. On the other hand, the most efficient riblet size for partial coverage was also a V-groove shape but had a slightly smaller peak height of 80 μm. This configuration produced a reduction of roughly 4% in the range of angle of attack that is typical for operation in the field. Our testing was limited to one size airfoil. However, comparison of our test data with recent numerical simulations by A-Mayoral and Jimenez suggest that an optimal size riblet configuration can be expressed in normalized form, involving only Reynolds number and the drag coefficient at design angle of attack.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872404858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872404858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2514/6.2012-232

DO - 10.2514/6.2012-232

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:84872404858

ER -