Downstream Behavioral and Electrophysiological Consequences of Word Prediction on Recognition Memory

Ryan J. Hubbard, Joost Rommers, Cassandra L. Jacobs, Kara D. Federmeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When people process language, they can use context to predict upcoming information, influencing processing and comprehension as seen in both behavioral and neural measures. Although numerous studies have shown immediate facilitative effects of confirmed predictions, the downstream consequences of prediction have been less explored. In the current study, we examined those consequences by probing participants’ recognition memory for words after they read sets of sentences. Participants read strongly and weakly constraining sentences with expected or unexpected endings (“I added my name to the list/basket”), and later were tested on their memory for the sentence endings while EEG was recorded. Critically, the memory test contained words that were predictable (“list”) but were never read (participants saw “basket”). Behaviorally, participants showed successful discrimination between old and new items, but false alarmed to the expected-item lures more often than to new items, showing that predicted words or concepts can linger, even when predictions are disconfirmed. Although false alarm rates did not differ by constraint, event-related potentials (ERPs) differed between false alarms to strongly and weakly predictable words. Additionally, previously unexpected (compared to previously expected) endings that appeared on the memory test elicited larger N1 and LPC amplitudes, suggesting greater attention and episodic recollection. In contrast, highly predictable sentence endings that had been read elicited reduced LPC amplitudes during the memory test. Thus, prediction can facilitate processing in the moment, but can also lead to false memory and reduced recollection for predictable information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number291
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 28 2019

Fingerprint

Automatic Data Processing
Evoked Potentials
Names
Recognition (Psychology)
Electroencephalography
Language
Discrimination (Psychology)

Keywords

  • ERP
  • false memory
  • language comprehension
  • prediction
  • recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Downstream Behavioral and Electrophysiological Consequences of Word Prediction on Recognition Memory. / Hubbard, Ryan J.; Rommers, Joost; Jacobs, Cassandra L.; Federmeier, Kara D.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 13, 291, 28.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{47083337b1f94d1c9ea512679a250ffe,
title = "Downstream Behavioral and Electrophysiological Consequences of Word Prediction on Recognition Memory",
abstract = "When people process language, they can use context to predict upcoming information, influencing processing and comprehension as seen in both behavioral and neural measures. Although numerous studies have shown immediate facilitative effects of confirmed predictions, the downstream consequences of prediction have been less explored. In the current study, we examined those consequences by probing participants’ recognition memory for words after they read sets of sentences. Participants read strongly and weakly constraining sentences with expected or unexpected endings (“I added my name to the list/basket”), and later were tested on their memory for the sentence endings while EEG was recorded. Critically, the memory test contained words that were predictable (“list”) but were never read (participants saw “basket”). Behaviorally, participants showed successful discrimination between old and new items, but false alarmed to the expected-item lures more often than to new items, showing that predicted words or concepts can linger, even when predictions are disconfirmed. Although false alarm rates did not differ by constraint, event-related potentials (ERPs) differed between false alarms to strongly and weakly predictable words. Additionally, previously unexpected (compared to previously expected) endings that appeared on the memory test elicited larger N1 and LPC amplitudes, suggesting greater attention and episodic recollection. In contrast, highly predictable sentence endings that had been read elicited reduced LPC amplitudes during the memory test. Thus, prediction can facilitate processing in the moment, but can also lead to false memory and reduced recollection for predictable information.",
keywords = "ERP, false memory, language comprehension, prediction, recognition",
author = "Hubbard, {Ryan J.} and Joost Rommers and Jacobs, {Cassandra L.} and Federmeier, {Kara D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "28",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2019.00291",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Downstream Behavioral and Electrophysiological Consequences of Word Prediction on Recognition Memory

AU - Hubbard, Ryan J.

AU - Rommers, Joost

AU - Jacobs, Cassandra L.

AU - Federmeier, Kara D.

PY - 2019/8/28

Y1 - 2019/8/28

N2 - When people process language, they can use context to predict upcoming information, influencing processing and comprehension as seen in both behavioral and neural measures. Although numerous studies have shown immediate facilitative effects of confirmed predictions, the downstream consequences of prediction have been less explored. In the current study, we examined those consequences by probing participants’ recognition memory for words after they read sets of sentences. Participants read strongly and weakly constraining sentences with expected or unexpected endings (“I added my name to the list/basket”), and later were tested on their memory for the sentence endings while EEG was recorded. Critically, the memory test contained words that were predictable (“list”) but were never read (participants saw “basket”). Behaviorally, participants showed successful discrimination between old and new items, but false alarmed to the expected-item lures more often than to new items, showing that predicted words or concepts can linger, even when predictions are disconfirmed. Although false alarm rates did not differ by constraint, event-related potentials (ERPs) differed between false alarms to strongly and weakly predictable words. Additionally, previously unexpected (compared to previously expected) endings that appeared on the memory test elicited larger N1 and LPC amplitudes, suggesting greater attention and episodic recollection. In contrast, highly predictable sentence endings that had been read elicited reduced LPC amplitudes during the memory test. Thus, prediction can facilitate processing in the moment, but can also lead to false memory and reduced recollection for predictable information.

AB - When people process language, they can use context to predict upcoming information, influencing processing and comprehension as seen in both behavioral and neural measures. Although numerous studies have shown immediate facilitative effects of confirmed predictions, the downstream consequences of prediction have been less explored. In the current study, we examined those consequences by probing participants’ recognition memory for words after they read sets of sentences. Participants read strongly and weakly constraining sentences with expected or unexpected endings (“I added my name to the list/basket”), and later were tested on their memory for the sentence endings while EEG was recorded. Critically, the memory test contained words that were predictable (“list”) but were never read (participants saw “basket”). Behaviorally, participants showed successful discrimination between old and new items, but false alarmed to the expected-item lures more often than to new items, showing that predicted words or concepts can linger, even when predictions are disconfirmed. Although false alarm rates did not differ by constraint, event-related potentials (ERPs) differed between false alarms to strongly and weakly predictable words. Additionally, previously unexpected (compared to previously expected) endings that appeared on the memory test elicited larger N1 and LPC amplitudes, suggesting greater attention and episodic recollection. In contrast, highly predictable sentence endings that had been read elicited reduced LPC amplitudes during the memory test. Thus, prediction can facilitate processing in the moment, but can also lead to false memory and reduced recollection for predictable information.

KW - ERP

KW - false memory

KW - language comprehension

KW - prediction

KW - recognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072735297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072735297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00291

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00291

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072735297

VL - 13

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

M1 - 291

ER -