Dominant language transfer in adult second language learners and heritage speakers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The effects of language transfer have been amply documented in second language (L2) acquisition and, to a lesser extent, in the language contact/loss literature (Cook, 2003). In both cases, the stronger and often dominant language encroaches into the structure of the less dominant language in systematic ways. But are transfer effects in these two situations comparable: is first language (L1) influence in adult L2 learners similar to L2 influence in the L1 of early bilinguals? The current study addresses this question by investigating knowledge of Spanish clitics, clitic left dislocations, and differential object marking (DOM) in 72 L2 learners and 67 Spanish heritage speakers. The contact language, English, is assumed to not instantiate these syntactic properties. Results of an oral production task and a written acceptability judgment task indicated overall advantages for the heritage speakers in some areas, but similar effects of transfer from English in the two groups. Transfer effects were less pronounced with core aspects of grammar (syntax proper in the case of clitics) than with aspects of grammar that lie at the interfaces of syntax and semantics/pragmatics, as in the case of clitic left dislocations and DOM. These findings have implications for current views on the vulnerability of certain linguistic interfaces in language development (Sorace, 2004; Serratrice et al., 2004; Tsimpli and Sorace, 2006; White, 2009) and for theories that stress the role of age in L2 acquisition and permanent transfer effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-327
Number of pages35
JournalSecond Language Research
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2010

Fingerprint

language
syntax
grammar
contact
language acquisition
English language
pragmatics
vulnerability
semantics
linguistics
Group

Keywords

  • Clitics
  • Differential object marking
  • Dislocations
  • Dominant language
  • Heritage speakers
  • Spanish

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Dominant language transfer in adult second language learners and heritage speakers. / Montrul, Silvina Andrea.

In: Second Language Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.07.2010, p. 293-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0ee8c8b2f6d42a2b13881cad989dc13,
title = "Dominant language transfer in adult second language learners and heritage speakers",
abstract = "The effects of language transfer have been amply documented in second language (L2) acquisition and, to a lesser extent, in the language contact/loss literature (Cook, 2003). In both cases, the stronger and often dominant language encroaches into the structure of the less dominant language in systematic ways. But are transfer effects in these two situations comparable: is first language (L1) influence in adult L2 learners similar to L2 influence in the L1 of early bilinguals? The current study addresses this question by investigating knowledge of Spanish clitics, clitic left dislocations, and differential object marking (DOM) in 72 L2 learners and 67 Spanish heritage speakers. The contact language, English, is assumed to not instantiate these syntactic properties. Results of an oral production task and a written acceptability judgment task indicated overall advantages for the heritage speakers in some areas, but similar effects of transfer from English in the two groups. Transfer effects were less pronounced with core aspects of grammar (syntax proper in the case of clitics) than with aspects of grammar that lie at the interfaces of syntax and semantics/pragmatics, as in the case of clitic left dislocations and DOM. These findings have implications for current views on the vulnerability of certain linguistic interfaces in language development (Sorace, 2004; Serratrice et al., 2004; Tsimpli and Sorace, 2006; White, 2009) and for theories that stress the role of age in L2 acquisition and permanent transfer effects.",
keywords = "Clitics, Differential object marking, Dislocations, Dominant language, Heritage speakers, Spanish",
author = "Montrul, {Silvina Andrea}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0267658310365768",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "293--327",
journal = "Second Language Research",
issn = "0267-6583",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dominant language transfer in adult second language learners and heritage speakers

AU - Montrul, Silvina Andrea

PY - 2010/7/1

Y1 - 2010/7/1

N2 - The effects of language transfer have been amply documented in second language (L2) acquisition and, to a lesser extent, in the language contact/loss literature (Cook, 2003). In both cases, the stronger and often dominant language encroaches into the structure of the less dominant language in systematic ways. But are transfer effects in these two situations comparable: is first language (L1) influence in adult L2 learners similar to L2 influence in the L1 of early bilinguals? The current study addresses this question by investigating knowledge of Spanish clitics, clitic left dislocations, and differential object marking (DOM) in 72 L2 learners and 67 Spanish heritage speakers. The contact language, English, is assumed to not instantiate these syntactic properties. Results of an oral production task and a written acceptability judgment task indicated overall advantages for the heritage speakers in some areas, but similar effects of transfer from English in the two groups. Transfer effects were less pronounced with core aspects of grammar (syntax proper in the case of clitics) than with aspects of grammar that lie at the interfaces of syntax and semantics/pragmatics, as in the case of clitic left dislocations and DOM. These findings have implications for current views on the vulnerability of certain linguistic interfaces in language development (Sorace, 2004; Serratrice et al., 2004; Tsimpli and Sorace, 2006; White, 2009) and for theories that stress the role of age in L2 acquisition and permanent transfer effects.

AB - The effects of language transfer have been amply documented in second language (L2) acquisition and, to a lesser extent, in the language contact/loss literature (Cook, 2003). In both cases, the stronger and often dominant language encroaches into the structure of the less dominant language in systematic ways. But are transfer effects in these two situations comparable: is first language (L1) influence in adult L2 learners similar to L2 influence in the L1 of early bilinguals? The current study addresses this question by investigating knowledge of Spanish clitics, clitic left dislocations, and differential object marking (DOM) in 72 L2 learners and 67 Spanish heritage speakers. The contact language, English, is assumed to not instantiate these syntactic properties. Results of an oral production task and a written acceptability judgment task indicated overall advantages for the heritage speakers in some areas, but similar effects of transfer from English in the two groups. Transfer effects were less pronounced with core aspects of grammar (syntax proper in the case of clitics) than with aspects of grammar that lie at the interfaces of syntax and semantics/pragmatics, as in the case of clitic left dislocations and DOM. These findings have implications for current views on the vulnerability of certain linguistic interfaces in language development (Sorace, 2004; Serratrice et al., 2004; Tsimpli and Sorace, 2006; White, 2009) and for theories that stress the role of age in L2 acquisition and permanent transfer effects.

KW - Clitics

KW - Differential object marking

KW - Dislocations

KW - Dominant language

KW - Heritage speakers

KW - Spanish

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954634843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954634843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0267658310365768

DO - 10.1177/0267658310365768

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954634843

VL - 26

SP - 293

EP - 327

JO - Second Language Research

JF - Second Language Research

SN - 0267-6583

IS - 3

ER -