@article{28ad6bea09ef49f78a08402874253702,
title = "Domestic contention on critical foreign-policy issues: The case of the United States",
author = "Vasquez, {John A.}",
note = "Funding Information: My thanks to Marie T. Henehan for several suggestions and ideas derived from her dissertation work on the role of Congress in American foreign policy. My thanks also to Harold Guetzkow, Peter Katzenstein, and the reviewers of 10, who offered stimulating criticisms of several points. Support for this work has been provided by the Rutgers University Research Council and Faculty Academic Study Program. 1. See Walter Lippmann, Public Opinion (New York: Macmillan, 1922); George F. Kennan, American Diplomacy, 1900-1950 (New York: Mentor, 1951), pp. 81-82; Gabriel A. Almond, The American People and Foreign Policy (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1950), pp. 53-65, chaps. 4 and 5. 2. This is confirmed by the research of Ole R. Holsti and James N. Rosenau, American Leadership in WorldAffairs: Vietnam and the Breakdown of Consensus (Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1984); Eugene Wittkopf and Michael Maggiotto, {"}Elites and Masses: A Comparative Analysis of Attitudes toward America's World Role,{"} Journal of Politics 45 (1983), pp. 303-34. 3. Bernard C. Cohen and Scott A. Harris, {"}Foreign Policy,{"} in F. Greenstein and N. Polsby, eds., Policies and Policymaking, vol. 6 of Handbook of Political Science (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1975), pp. 381^37, esp. p. 407.",
year = "1985",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1017/S0020818300027053",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "643--666",
journal = "International Organization",
issn = "0020-8183",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",
}