Does concrete language in disclosures increase willingness to invest?

W. Brooke Elliott, Kristina M. Rennekamp, Brian J. White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

As part of its push for more plain English in disclosures, the SEC argues that firms should use more concrete language to make abstract concepts clearer to investors. We use two experiments to show that, when concrete language is highlighted in a prospectus, investors are significantly more willing to invest in a firm than when abstract language is highlighted. Furthermore, we show the effect of concrete language is particularly important when investors feel more psychologically distant from a firm. Drawing on psychology theory, we predict and find that concrete language increases investors’ feelings of comfort in their ability to evaluate an investment. Our study contributes to the literature on how language choices in disclosures affect investors’ judgments by demonstrating that a simple, yet potentially powerful reporting tool of emphasizing concrete language may attract investors who may otherwise be reluctant to invest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)839-865
Number of pages27
JournalReview of Accounting Studies
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Keywords

  • Concrete language
  • Corporate disclosure
  • Investor comfort
  • Local bias
  • Psychological distance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • General Business, Management and Accounting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does concrete language in disclosures increase willingness to invest?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this