Does beauty matter in undergraduate education?

Tatyana Deryugina, Olga Shurchkov

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

Physically attractive individuals achieve greater success in terms of earnings and status than those who are less attractive. However, whether this "beauty premium" arises primarily because of differences in ability or confidence, bias, or sorting remains unknown. We use a rich dataset from a women's college to evaluate each of these three mechanisms at the college level. We find that students judged to be more attractive perform significantly worse on standardized tests but, conditional on test scores, are not evaluated more favorably at the point of admission, suggesting that more attractive people do not possess greater abilities at the beginning of college. Controlling for test scores, more attractive students receive only marginally better grades in some specifications, and the magnitudes of the differences are very small. Finally, there is substantial beauty-based sorting into areas of study and occupations. (JEL J16, I21, I23)

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages940-961
Number of pages22
JournalEconomic Inquiry
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Undergraduate education
Test scores
Sorting
Admission
Premium
Confidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Does beauty matter in undergraduate education? / Deryugina, Tatyana; Shurchkov, Olga.

In: Economic Inquiry, Vol. 53, No. 2, 01.04.2015, p. 940-961.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Deryugina T, Shurchkov O. Does beauty matter in undergraduate education? Economic Inquiry. 2015 Apr 1;53(2):940-961. Available from, DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12152
Deryugina, Tatyana ; Shurchkov, Olga. / Does beauty matter in undergraduate education?. In: Economic Inquiry. 2015 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 940-961
@article{1aea259751f74c5ab7df964a81ce6f65,
title = "Does beauty matter in undergraduate education?",
abstract = "Physically attractive individuals achieve greater success in terms of earnings and status than those who are less attractive. However, whether this {"}beauty premium{"} arises primarily because of differences in ability or confidence, bias, or sorting remains unknown. We use a rich dataset from a women's college to evaluate each of these three mechanisms at the college level. We find that students judged to be more attractive perform significantly worse on standardized tests but, conditional on test scores, are not evaluated more favorably at the point of admission, suggesting that more attractive people do not possess greater abilities at the beginning of college. Controlling for test scores, more attractive students receive only marginally better grades in some specifications, and the magnitudes of the differences are very small. Finally, there is substantial beauty-based sorting into areas of study and occupations. (JEL J16, I21, I23)",
author = "Tatyana Deryugina and Olga Shurchkov",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/ecin.12152",
volume = "53",
pages = "940--961",
journal = "Economic Inquiry",
issn = "0095-2583",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does beauty matter in undergraduate education?

AU - Deryugina,Tatyana

AU - Shurchkov,Olga

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Physically attractive individuals achieve greater success in terms of earnings and status than those who are less attractive. However, whether this "beauty premium" arises primarily because of differences in ability or confidence, bias, or sorting remains unknown. We use a rich dataset from a women's college to evaluate each of these three mechanisms at the college level. We find that students judged to be more attractive perform significantly worse on standardized tests but, conditional on test scores, are not evaluated more favorably at the point of admission, suggesting that more attractive people do not possess greater abilities at the beginning of college. Controlling for test scores, more attractive students receive only marginally better grades in some specifications, and the magnitudes of the differences are very small. Finally, there is substantial beauty-based sorting into areas of study and occupations. (JEL J16, I21, I23)

AB - Physically attractive individuals achieve greater success in terms of earnings and status than those who are less attractive. However, whether this "beauty premium" arises primarily because of differences in ability or confidence, bias, or sorting remains unknown. We use a rich dataset from a women's college to evaluate each of these three mechanisms at the college level. We find that students judged to be more attractive perform significantly worse on standardized tests but, conditional on test scores, are not evaluated more favorably at the point of admission, suggesting that more attractive people do not possess greater abilities at the beginning of college. Controlling for test scores, more attractive students receive only marginally better grades in some specifications, and the magnitudes of the differences are very small. Finally, there is substantial beauty-based sorting into areas of study and occupations. (JEL J16, I21, I23)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922875243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922875243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ecin.12152

DO - 10.1111/ecin.12152

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 940

EP - 961

JO - Economic Inquiry

T2 - Economic Inquiry

JF - Economic Inquiry

SN - 0095-2583

IS - 2

ER -