Do transaction costs and Risk preferences influence marketing arrangements in the Illinois hog industry?

Jason R.V. Franken, Joost M.E. Pennings, Philip Garcia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Risk reduction and transaction costs are often used to explain contracting in the U.S. hog industry with little empirical support. Using a unified conceptual framework that draws from risk behavior and transaction cost theories, in combination with unique survey and accounting data, we demonstrate that risk preferences and asset specificity impact Illinois producers' use of contracts and spot markets. In particular, producers' investments in specific hog genetics and human capital are related to selection of long-term marketing contracts over spot markets. Producers who perceive greater levels of price risk and/or are more averse are more (less) likely to use contracts (spot markets).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)297-315
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Volume34
Issue number2
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Keywords

  • Asset specificity
  • Contracts
  • Hogs
  • Risk attitude
  • Risk behavior
  • Risk perception
  • Transaction costs economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do transaction costs and Risk preferences influence marketing arrangements in the Illinois hog industry?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this