Do Required Minimum Distribution Rules Matter? The Effect of the 2009 Holiday on Retirement Plan Distributions

Jeffrey R. Brown, James Poterba, David P. Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper investigates how the one-year suspension in 2009 of the Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) rules associated with qualified retirement plans affected the distribution elections of participants at a large retirement services provider. Roughly one third of those who were affected by the RMD rules in 2008 discontinued their distributions in 2009. The suspension probabilities of those for whom 2008 distributions equaled the RMD amount, a plausible indication that the RMD rules were a binding constraint, were not very different from the corresponding probabilities of those for whom 2008 distributions exceeded the RMD amount. Participants who died within six years of the distribution holiday were less likely to suspend than those who were still alive in late 2015, suggesting that RMD rules are more likely to bind for those with longer retirement horizons. The probability of suspension declined substantially with age and rose modestly with financial resources. Individuals taking monthly distributions were less likely to suspend distributions than those taking annual distributions, particularly at higher wealth levels, perhaps because they use their distributions to finance monthly consumption. The findings offer insights on the relationship between participant attributes and distribution behavior, bear on the choice between competing models of saver behavior, and provide some evidence on the revenue consequences of changing RMD rules.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-109
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Public Economics
Volume151
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Retirement
Holidays
Service provider
Revenue
Elections
Wealth
Finance
Financial resources

Keywords

  • 401(k)
  • Pension
  • Qualified plans
  • Required minimum distributions
  • Retirement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Do Required Minimum Distribution Rules Matter? The Effect of the 2009 Holiday on Retirement Plan Distributions. / Brown, Jeffrey R.; Poterba, James; Richardson, David P.

In: Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 151, 07.2017, p. 96-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{952eb89d70f4499e81f811320f8a5cac,
title = "Do Required Minimum Distribution Rules Matter? The Effect of the 2009 Holiday on Retirement Plan Distributions",
abstract = "This paper investigates how the one-year suspension in 2009 of the Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) rules associated with qualified retirement plans affected the distribution elections of participants at a large retirement services provider. Roughly one third of those who were affected by the RMD rules in 2008 discontinued their distributions in 2009. The suspension probabilities of those for whom 2008 distributions equaled the RMD amount, a plausible indication that the RMD rules were a binding constraint, were not very different from the corresponding probabilities of those for whom 2008 distributions exceeded the RMD amount. Participants who died within six years of the distribution holiday were less likely to suspend than those who were still alive in late 2015, suggesting that RMD rules are more likely to bind for those with longer retirement horizons. The probability of suspension declined substantially with age and rose modestly with financial resources. Individuals taking monthly distributions were less likely to suspend distributions than those taking annual distributions, particularly at higher wealth levels, perhaps because they use their distributions to finance monthly consumption. The findings offer insights on the relationship between participant attributes and distribution behavior, bear on the choice between competing models of saver behavior, and provide some evidence on the revenue consequences of changing RMD rules.",
keywords = "401(k), Pension, Qualified plans, Required minimum distributions, Retirement",
author = "Brown, {Jeffrey R.} and James Poterba and Richardson, {David P.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "151",
pages = "96--109",
journal = "Journal of Public Economics",
issn = "0047-2727",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Required Minimum Distribution Rules Matter? The Effect of the 2009 Holiday on Retirement Plan Distributions

AU - Brown, Jeffrey R.

AU - Poterba, James

AU - Richardson, David P.

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - This paper investigates how the one-year suspension in 2009 of the Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) rules associated with qualified retirement plans affected the distribution elections of participants at a large retirement services provider. Roughly one third of those who were affected by the RMD rules in 2008 discontinued their distributions in 2009. The suspension probabilities of those for whom 2008 distributions equaled the RMD amount, a plausible indication that the RMD rules were a binding constraint, were not very different from the corresponding probabilities of those for whom 2008 distributions exceeded the RMD amount. Participants who died within six years of the distribution holiday were less likely to suspend than those who were still alive in late 2015, suggesting that RMD rules are more likely to bind for those with longer retirement horizons. The probability of suspension declined substantially with age and rose modestly with financial resources. Individuals taking monthly distributions were less likely to suspend distributions than those taking annual distributions, particularly at higher wealth levels, perhaps because they use their distributions to finance monthly consumption. The findings offer insights on the relationship between participant attributes and distribution behavior, bear on the choice between competing models of saver behavior, and provide some evidence on the revenue consequences of changing RMD rules.

AB - This paper investigates how the one-year suspension in 2009 of the Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) rules associated with qualified retirement plans affected the distribution elections of participants at a large retirement services provider. Roughly one third of those who were affected by the RMD rules in 2008 discontinued their distributions in 2009. The suspension probabilities of those for whom 2008 distributions equaled the RMD amount, a plausible indication that the RMD rules were a binding constraint, were not very different from the corresponding probabilities of those for whom 2008 distributions exceeded the RMD amount. Participants who died within six years of the distribution holiday were less likely to suspend than those who were still alive in late 2015, suggesting that RMD rules are more likely to bind for those with longer retirement horizons. The probability of suspension declined substantially with age and rose modestly with financial resources. Individuals taking monthly distributions were less likely to suspend distributions than those taking annual distributions, particularly at higher wealth levels, perhaps because they use their distributions to finance monthly consumption. The findings offer insights on the relationship between participant attributes and distribution behavior, bear on the choice between competing models of saver behavior, and provide some evidence on the revenue consequences of changing RMD rules.

KW - 401(k)

KW - Pension

KW - Qualified plans

KW - Required minimum distributions

KW - Retirement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002243987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002243987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85002243987

VL - 151

SP - 96

EP - 109

JO - Journal of Public Economics

JF - Journal of Public Economics

SN - 0047-2727

ER -