TY - JOUR
T1 - Do male sticklebacks use visual and/or olfactory cues to assess a potential mate's history with predation risk?
AU - Dellinger, Marion
AU - Zhang, Weiran
AU - Bell, Alison M.
AU - Hellmann, Jennifer K.
N1 - Thank you to Jason Keagy for help with training on scoring courtship behaviours and to the rest of the Bell lab for help with the experimental work and manuscript edits. Thank you to Ryan Earley for help with the cortisol collection and to Becky Fuller for her collaboration in UV measurements. We also thank Lois L. Hoyer as well for supervising M.D. during this program and during the 2016 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Symposium in Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A. where this work was presented. This study was supported by a National Science Foundation grant (number 1121980 ) to A.M.B and an NIH grant (number GM082937 ) to the University of Illinois. M.D. was supported by the 2016 Merial Veterinary Scholars Program . J.K.H. is currently supported by an NIH fellowship ( F32GM121033 ).
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - Differential allocation occurs when individuals alter their reproductive investment based on their mate's traits. A previous study showed that male threespine sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus, reduced courtship towards females that had previously been exposed to predation risk compared to unexposed females. This suggests that males can detect a female's previous history with predation risk, but the mechanisms by which males assess a female's history are unknown. To determine whether males use chemical and/or visual cues to detect a female's previous history with predation risk, we compared rates of courtship behaviour in the presence of visual and/or olfactory cues of predator-exposed females versus unexposed females in a 2 × 2 factorial design. We found that males differentiate between unexposed and predator-exposed females using visual cues: regardless of the olfactory cues present, males performed fewer zigzags (a conspicuous courtship behaviour) when they were exposed to visual cues from predator-exposed females compared to unexposed females. However, males’ response to olfactory cues changed over the course of the experiment: initially, males performed fewer courtship displays when they received olfactory cues of predator-exposed females compared to unexposed females, but they did not discriminate between cues from predator-exposed and unexposed females later in the experiment. A follow-up experiment found that levels of cortisol released by both predator-exposed and unexposed females decreased over the course of the experiment. If cortisol is linked to or correlated with olfactory cues of predation risk that are released by females, then this suggests that the olfactory cues became less potent over the course of the experiment. Altogether, these results suggest that males use both visual and olfactory cues to differentiate between unexposed and predator-exposed females, which may help ensure reliable communication in a noisy environment.
AB - Differential allocation occurs when individuals alter their reproductive investment based on their mate's traits. A previous study showed that male threespine sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus, reduced courtship towards females that had previously been exposed to predation risk compared to unexposed females. This suggests that males can detect a female's previous history with predation risk, but the mechanisms by which males assess a female's history are unknown. To determine whether males use chemical and/or visual cues to detect a female's previous history with predation risk, we compared rates of courtship behaviour in the presence of visual and/or olfactory cues of predator-exposed females versus unexposed females in a 2 × 2 factorial design. We found that males differentiate between unexposed and predator-exposed females using visual cues: regardless of the olfactory cues present, males performed fewer zigzags (a conspicuous courtship behaviour) when they were exposed to visual cues from predator-exposed females compared to unexposed females. However, males’ response to olfactory cues changed over the course of the experiment: initially, males performed fewer courtship displays when they received olfactory cues of predator-exposed females compared to unexposed females, but they did not discriminate between cues from predator-exposed and unexposed females later in the experiment. A follow-up experiment found that levels of cortisol released by both predator-exposed and unexposed females decreased over the course of the experiment. If cortisol is linked to or correlated with olfactory cues of predation risk that are released by females, then this suggests that the olfactory cues became less potent over the course of the experiment. Altogether, these results suggest that males use both visual and olfactory cues to differentiate between unexposed and predator-exposed females, which may help ensure reliable communication in a noisy environment.
KW - Gasterosteus aculeatus
KW - cortisol
KW - courtship
KW - differential allocation
KW - maternal effect
KW - multimodal communication
KW - reproductive investment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055435596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055435596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.09.015
DO - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.09.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 31666748
AN - SCOPUS:85055435596
SN - 0003-3472
VL - 145
SP - 151
EP - 159
JO - Animal Behaviour
JF - Animal Behaviour
ER -