Do Companies Redact Material Information from Confidential SEC Filings? Evidence from the FAST Act

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Securities and Exchange Commission permits companies to redact proprietary information from material contract filings, so long as the redacted information (1) would cause competitive harm if disclosed, and (2) the information is legally immaterial. Because these joint criteria are inherently contradictory, we examine whether legally immaterial redacted information is economically material to investors. We find that firms' stock price discovery process is significantly slower and insider trading is significantly greater after companies file redacted contracts compared to nonredacted contracts. We then examine the impact of the 2019 FAST Act, which reduced the SEC's oversight of redacted contracts. Companies redact more frequently and insider trading (but not speed of stock price discovery) is more pronounced after the FAST Act. Taken together, these findings suggest that at least some redacted information is economically material to investors and that reducing SEC oversight of redacted information may not be in investors' best interests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-433
Number of pages29
JournalAccounting Review
Volume98
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2023

Keywords

  • confidential treatment
  • insider trading
  • intraperiod timeliness
  • materiality
  • redacted disclosure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do Companies Redact Material Information from Confidential SEC Filings? Evidence from the FAST Act'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this