TY - JOUR
T1 - Diversity in local and comparative contexts grounding change in academic libraries through dialogue
AU - Kerr, Paulette
AU - La Barre, Kathryn
AU - Lilley, Spencer
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Paulette Kerr, Kathryn La Barre, and Spencer Lilley.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - In October 2020, the authors accepted an invita-tion to participate in an experimental collabora-tion observing an equitable, global, and inclusive process. Inspired by an Inclusive Classroom webinar1 at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the shared Decolonizing Checklist,2 the authors considered our tasks: 1) to develop a checklist or brief guide that is international in scope to help librarians worldwide develop their own or other educators’ instructional materials, that is antiracist or inclusive, and 2) to publish the checklist/guide and a reflective essay of the process. After reviewing the original checklist and attempt-ing to construct our own, we realized that the task was more nuanced than originally thought, especially as we considered the central roles of libraries within the academy, and what would drive our construction of this checklist. We deliberated on matters of terminol-ogy, specific areas of focus for librarians and faculty, our personal viewpoints, and concluded that the conversation needed voices that represented other and wider perspectives. In the spirit of inclusiveness, we offer our conversation as a spark to further conversations towards a more fulsome and robust outcome.
AB - In October 2020, the authors accepted an invita-tion to participate in an experimental collabora-tion observing an equitable, global, and inclusive process. Inspired by an Inclusive Classroom webinar1 at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the shared Decolonizing Checklist,2 the authors considered our tasks: 1) to develop a checklist or brief guide that is international in scope to help librarians worldwide develop their own or other educators’ instructional materials, that is antiracist or inclusive, and 2) to publish the checklist/guide and a reflective essay of the process. After reviewing the original checklist and attempt-ing to construct our own, we realized that the task was more nuanced than originally thought, especially as we considered the central roles of libraries within the academy, and what would drive our construction of this checklist. We deliberated on matters of terminol-ogy, specific areas of focus for librarians and faculty, our personal viewpoints, and concluded that the conversation needed voices that represented other and wider perspectives. In the spirit of inclusiveness, we offer our conversation as a spark to further conversations towards a more fulsome and robust outcome.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120705354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120705354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5860/CRLN.82.10.458
DO - 10.5860/CRLN.82.10.458
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85120705354
SN - 0099-0086
VL - 82
SP - 458
EP - 465
JO - College and Research Libraries News
JF - College and Research Libraries News
IS - 10
ER -