Distinguishing Between Silent and Vocal Minorities: Not All Deviants Feel Marginal

Kimberly Rios Morrison, Dale T. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

People's opinions can deviate from that of the average group member in two ways. Descriptive deviants diverge from the average group attitude in a direction consistent with the desirable group attitude; prescriptive deviants diverge from the average group attitude in a direction inconsistent with the desirable group attitude. Three studies tested the hypothesis that descriptive deviants are more willing to express their opinions than either nondeviants or prescriptive deviants. Study 1 found that college students reported more comfort in expressing descriptive deviant opinions because descriptive deviance induced feelings of superior conformity (i.e., being "different but good"). Study 2 found that descriptive deviants reported more pride after expressing their opinions, were rated as more proud by an observer, and were more willing to publicize their opinions. Study 3 showed that political bumper stickers with descriptive deviant messages were displayed disproportionately more frequently than were those with prescriptive deviant messages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)871-882
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of personality and social psychology
Volume94
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • deviance
  • minorities
  • social norms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Distinguishing Between Silent and Vocal Minorities: Not All Deviants Feel Marginal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this