Discussion's Impact on Political Allocations: An Experimental Approach

Adam F. Simon, Tracy Sulkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this study, we unite two experimental traditions to examine the impact of discursive processes on political decision making. We directly manipulate the presence and timing of discussion in the “divide-the-dollar” game to assess the effects of discussion on participants' allocations and perceptions of the game's legitimacy. To investigate the influence of structure, we also manipulate the presence of a majority/minority cleavage among participants. The dependent measures in all instances are the players' allocations, the outcome of the game, and psychometric indicators of legitimacy perceptions. Results indicate that the presence of discussion can generate outcomes that are perceived as more equitable and fair in some circumstances—namely, when a cleavage is present. These findings establish the utility of this paradigm, as well as an important baseline for assessing the probable impacts of proposals to integrate deliberation into political decision making.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)403-412
JournalPolitical Analysis
Volume10
Issue number04
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

political decision making
legitimacy
deliberation
psychometrics
dollar
minority
paradigm

Cite this

Discussion's Impact on Political Allocations : An Experimental Approach. / Simon, Adam F.; Sulkin, Tracy.

In: Political Analysis, Vol. 10, No. 04, 2002, p. 403-412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ba4ffdd029514d2a8654fd35a057cc1a,
title = "Discussion's Impact on Political Allocations: An Experimental Approach",
abstract = "In this study, we unite two experimental traditions to examine the impact of discursive processes on political decision making. We directly manipulate the presence and timing of discussion in the “divide-the-dollar” game to assess the effects of discussion on participants' allocations and perceptions of the game's legitimacy. To investigate the influence of structure, we also manipulate the presence of a majority/minority cleavage among participants. The dependent measures in all instances are the players' allocations, the outcome of the game, and psychometric indicators of legitimacy perceptions. Results indicate that the presence of discussion can generate outcomes that are perceived as more equitable and fair in some circumstances—namely, when a cleavage is present. These findings establish the utility of this paradigm, as well as an important baseline for assessing the probable impacts of proposals to integrate deliberation into political decision making.",
author = "Simon, {Adam F.} and Tracy Sulkin",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1093/pan/10.4.403",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "403--412",
journal = "Political Analysis",
issn = "1047-1987",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "04",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discussion's Impact on Political Allocations

T2 - An Experimental Approach

AU - Simon, Adam F.

AU - Sulkin, Tracy

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - In this study, we unite two experimental traditions to examine the impact of discursive processes on political decision making. We directly manipulate the presence and timing of discussion in the “divide-the-dollar” game to assess the effects of discussion on participants' allocations and perceptions of the game's legitimacy. To investigate the influence of structure, we also manipulate the presence of a majority/minority cleavage among participants. The dependent measures in all instances are the players' allocations, the outcome of the game, and psychometric indicators of legitimacy perceptions. Results indicate that the presence of discussion can generate outcomes that are perceived as more equitable and fair in some circumstances—namely, when a cleavage is present. These findings establish the utility of this paradigm, as well as an important baseline for assessing the probable impacts of proposals to integrate deliberation into political decision making.

AB - In this study, we unite two experimental traditions to examine the impact of discursive processes on political decision making. We directly manipulate the presence and timing of discussion in the “divide-the-dollar” game to assess the effects of discussion on participants' allocations and perceptions of the game's legitimacy. To investigate the influence of structure, we also manipulate the presence of a majority/minority cleavage among participants. The dependent measures in all instances are the players' allocations, the outcome of the game, and psychometric indicators of legitimacy perceptions. Results indicate that the presence of discussion can generate outcomes that are perceived as more equitable and fair in some circumstances—namely, when a cleavage is present. These findings establish the utility of this paradigm, as well as an important baseline for assessing the probable impacts of proposals to integrate deliberation into political decision making.

U2 - 10.1093/pan/10.4.403

DO - 10.1093/pan/10.4.403

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 403

EP - 412

JO - Political Analysis

JF - Political Analysis

SN - 1047-1987

IS - 04

ER -