TY - JOUR
T1 - Disappointment
AU - Greenberg, Jessica
AU - Muir, Sarah
N1 - Funding Information:
For their careful readings and thoughtful suggestions of works to include in this review, we thank Tiana Baki c Hayden, Ilana Gershon, Kelda Jamison, Alejandra Leal, Alejandro Paz,Nitzan Shoshan, Kabir Tambar, and Rihan Yeh.We also thank Zarino Lanni and Zhenzhou "Andy"Tan for their thorough research assistance. Finally, we thank Susan Gal for her encouragement and guidance
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/10/24
Y1 - 2022/10/24
N2 - In recent years, disappointment has emerged as a prominent topic of anthropological inquiry and theorization. We explore this disciplinary interest in order to probe the conditions that have made it possible, the lines of inquiry it opens up, and the self-reflexive critiques it underscores. Running throughout the anthropological literature on disappointment is a pressing concern with the messy, unpredictable, and friction-laden dimensions of social life, dimensions that eschew easy categorization in terms of the heroic/abject, agentive/passive, macro/micro, righteous/wrong-headed, or progressive/reactionary. After exploring the conditions that underlie disappointment, we discuss comparison, poetics, and slog as three domains of its anthropological analysis, highlighting key methodological innovations, ethnographic genres, and research questions within each area. We close with reflections on disappointment within the discipline, focusing on the experience of field research, the moral optimism of the discipline, and the institutional conditions that shape knowledge production and professional life.
AB - In recent years, disappointment has emerged as a prominent topic of anthropological inquiry and theorization. We explore this disciplinary interest in order to probe the conditions that have made it possible, the lines of inquiry it opens up, and the self-reflexive critiques it underscores. Running throughout the anthropological literature on disappointment is a pressing concern with the messy, unpredictable, and friction-laden dimensions of social life, dimensions that eschew easy categorization in terms of the heroic/abject, agentive/passive, macro/micro, righteous/wrong-headed, or progressive/reactionary. After exploring the conditions that underlie disappointment, we discuss comparison, poetics, and slog as three domains of its anthropological analysis, highlighting key methodological innovations, ethnographic genres, and research questions within each area. We close with reflections on disappointment within the discipline, focusing on the experience of field research, the moral optimism of the discipline, and the institutional conditions that shape knowledge production and professional life.
KW - comparison
KW - disappointment
KW - disillusion
KW - normativity
KW - poetics
KW - temporality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144806694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144806694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-anthro-041520-105355
DO - 10.1146/annurev-anthro-041520-105355
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85144806694
SN - 0084-6570
VL - 51
SP - 307
EP - 323
JO - Annual Review of Anthropology
JF - Annual Review of Anthropology
ER -