Directed forgetting in incidental learning and recognition testing: Support for a two-factor account

Lili Sahakyan, Peter F. Delaney

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Instructing people to forget a list of items often leads to better recall of subsequently studied lists (known as the benefits of directed forgetting). The authors have proposed that changes in study strategy are a central cause of the benefits (L. Sahakyan & P. F. Delaney, 2003). The authors address 2 results from the literature that are inconsistent with their strategy-based explanation: (a) the presence of benefits under incidental learning conditions and (b) the absence of benefits in recognition testing. Experiment 1 showed that incidental learning attenuated the benefits compared with intentional learning, as expected if a change of study strategy causes the benefits. Experiment 2 demonstrated benefits using recognition testing, albeit only when longer lists were used. Memory for source in directed forgetting was also explored using multinomial modeling. Results are discussed in terms of a 2-factor account of directed forgetting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)789-801
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Directed forgetting
  • Inhibition
  • Intentional forgetting
  • Multinomial modeling
  • Study strategies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Directed forgetting in incidental learning and recognition testing: Support for a two-factor account'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this