Abstract
Instructing people to forget a list of items often leads to better recall of subsequently studied lists (known as the benefits of directed forgetting). The authors have proposed that changes in study strategy are a central cause of the benefits (L. Sahakyan & P. F. Delaney, 2003). The authors address 2 results from the literature that are inconsistent with their strategy-based explanation: (a) the presence of benefits under incidental learning conditions and (b) the absence of benefits in recognition testing. Experiment 1 showed that incidental learning attenuated the benefits compared with intentional learning, as expected if a change of study strategy causes the benefits. Experiment 2 demonstrated benefits using recognition testing, albeit only when longer lists were used. Memory for source in directed forgetting was also explored using multinomial modeling. Results are discussed in terms of a 2-factor account of directed forgetting.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 789-801 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2005 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Directed forgetting
- Inhibition
- Intentional forgetting
- Multinomial modeling
- Study strategies
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language