Digital Repatriation as a Decolonizing Practice in the Archaeological Archive

Krystiana L. Krupa, Kelsey T. Grimm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Repatriation of archival materials holds great potential for decolonizing archaeological archives. This paper argues that while repatriation of human remains and cultural objects is required by law under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), traditional manuscript archives can and should be subject to the same standards for repatriation. The entirety of the archaeological archive can therefore be repatriated to descendant communities. In fact, many museums and other institutions have adopted the practice of digital repatriation of both documents and artifacts. By repatriating a facsimile of an important cultural item, institutions may actually perpetuate the colonial perspective that the original item’s proper place is with the institution instead of with its community of origin. This paper addresses situations in which it is both appropriate and inappropriate to repatriate a digital copy instead of the original object.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-58
JournalAcross the Disciplines
Volume18
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 8 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Digital Repatriation as a Decolonizing Practice in the Archaeological Archive'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this