TY - JOUR
T1 - Digital inequalities 2.0
T2 - Legacy inequalities in the information age
AU - Robinson, Laura
AU - Schulz, Jeremy
AU - Blank, Grant
AU - Ragnedda, Massimo
AU - Ono, Hiroshi
AU - Hogan, Bernie
AU - Mesch, Gustavo
AU - Cotton, Shelia R.
AU - Kretchmer, Susan B.
AU - Hale, Timothy M.
AU - Drabowicz, Tomasz
AU - Yan, Pu
AU - Wellman, Barry
AU - Harper, Molly Gloria
AU - Quan-Haase, Anabel
AU - Dunn, Hopeton S.
AU - Casilli, Antonio A.
AU - Tubaro, Paola
AU - Carveth, Rod
AU - Chen, Wenhong
AU - Wiest, Julie B.
AU - Dodel, Matías
AU - Stern, Michael J.
AU - Ball, Christopher
AU - Huang, Kuo Ting
AU - Khilnani, Aneka
N1 - served as an Affiliate at the UC San Diego Center for Research on Gender in the Professions andASA a CSection onouncil Member of the Consumers and Consumption. P, rheev hioeulds layn NSF funded postdoctoral fellowship at Cornell University after earning his Ph.D. at UC Berkel.e yHe has also done research and published in areas includin, gth deiogr,i ytqaul asloitcaitoivloeg ryesearch methods, work, aanndd family consumption. E-mail: jmschulz [at] berkeley [dot] edu
of Oxford. He received the William. FOgburn CarAchievement award from the Communication, Information eer Technology and Media Sociology section of the American Sociological Association in 2015. This award recognizes a sustained body of research that has made an outstanding contribution to the advancement of knowledge in the area of sociology of communication, information. technology and media sociology E-mail: grant [dot] blank [at] oii [dot] ox [dot] ac [dot] uk Massimo Ragnedda (Ph.D.) is a Senior Lecturer in Mass Communication at Nor,t hNuemwbcraias tUlen, iUv.eKrs.i twyhere he conducts research on the digital divide and social media. He is the co-vice chair of the Digital Divide Working Group (IAMCR) and co-convenor of NINSO (Northumbria Internet and Society Research Group). He has authored 12 books with his publicati-orenvs iaepwpeeda rjionugr nina lns,umerous peer and book chapters in English, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese and Russian texts. His books include: Digital capital: A Boudrieusian perspective on the digital divide (with Maria Laura Ruiu), Emerald Publishing, 2020; Digital inclusion: An international comparative analysis (co-edited with Bruce Mutsvairo), Lexington Books 2018; Theorizing the digital divide (co-edited with G. Muschert), Routledge (2017); The thdir digital diviAde: Weberian apoparch to digital inequa(2017), Routledge; lities The digital divide: The Internet and social inequality in international perspective (coedited with G. Muschert) (2013), Routledge. E-mail: massimo [dot] ragnedda [at] northumbria [dot] ac [dot] uk Hiroshi On(oPh.D., socio,l oCghyicago; Docent, Economics, Stockholm School of Economics) is Professor of Human Resources Management at Hitotsubashi University Business School and Affiliated Professor of SocioTleoxgaysA a&t M Univer. sHitey writes and speaks extensively on the relationships among motivation, happiness and productivity in the workplace, and the interplay between demographic change and labor market dynamics in Japan. His latest research focuss weso orkn rJeafpoarnm\u2019, especially on reducing work hours and increasin. g labor productivity E-mail: hono [at] ics [dot] hub [dot] hit-u [dot] ac [dot] jp Bernie Hogan (Ph.D. Toronto, 2009) is a Senior Research Fellow at the OAIIs saoncdi aRtee saeta trhceh Department of .S Woicthio tlroaginying in sociology and computer science, Hogan focuses on how social networks and social media can be designed to empower people to build stronger relationships and stronger communities. Hogan has published in a wide var-ieretyv ioefw veedn puaeps,e frrso imn spoeceirology journals (such as Social Networks, City and Co, mBumlulentiitny of Scieencchen Tology and So, and cietField Methodsy ). E-mail: bernie [dot] hogan [at] oii [dot] ox [dot] ac [dot] uk Gustavo S. Mesch is a Professor of Sociology and the Rector of the University of Haifa. His research interes, tsso acriea ltechnology and society effects of new media, youth Internet culture, social netwfo-rlkinse o. nHlien eis a cnudr roefntly studying patterns of cyber fraud scams, identity theft and the use of preventive measures, a study funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Israel. He has served as ASAChair of the CITAMS section and E-idni-tCorhief of Sociological Focusthe , the ofifcial journal of the North Central SAssociation (U.S.).ociological E-mail: gustavo [at] soc [dot] haifa [dot] ac [dot] il Shelia R. Cotten is an MSU Foundation Professor and the Associate Chair for Research in the Department of Media and Information at Michigan State Univer.s Sithye holAdsff iliate Professor positions in the Department of Sociology and the College of Engineering. Her research examines technology use across the life course and health, workforce, education, and social impacts of thiAs uMseS. aSnhde hisa sa aplassot Chair of CIT won the William. FOgburn Senior CAawreaerrd and the Public SocAiwolaorgdy. BeginninAugust 2020, she will be the g 1 Associate Vice President for Research Development ansd D ai sPtirnogvuoissth\u2019ed Professor at Clemson. University E-mail: cotten [at] msu [dot] edu
PY - 2020/7/6
Y1 - 2020/7/6
N2 - 2020 marks the 25th anniversary of the “digital divide.” Although a quarter century has passed, legacy digital inequalities continue, and emergent digital inequalities are proliferating. Many of the initial schisms identified in 1995 are still relevant today. Twenty-five years later, foundational access inequalities continue to separate the digital haves and the digital have-nots within and across countries. In addition, even ubiquitous-access populations are riven with skill inequalities and differentiated usage. Indeed, legacy digital inequalities persist vis-à-vis economic class, gender, sexuality, race and ethnicity, aging, disability, healthcare, education, rural residency, networks, and global geographies. At the same time, emergent forms of inequality now appear alongside legacy inequalities such that notions of digital inequalities must be continually expanded to become more nuanced. We capture the increasingly complex and interrelated nature of digital inequalities by introducing the concept of the “digital inequality stack.” The concept of the digital inequality stack encompasses access to connectivity networks, devices, and software, as well as collective access to network infrastructure. Other layers of the digital inequality stack include differentiated use and consumption, literacies and skills, production and programming, etc. When inequality exists at foundational layers of the digital inequality stack, this often translates into inequalities at higher levels. As we show across these many thematic foci, layers in the digital inequality stack may move in tandem with one another such that all layers of the digital inequality stack reinforce disadvantage.
AB - 2020 marks the 25th anniversary of the “digital divide.” Although a quarter century has passed, legacy digital inequalities continue, and emergent digital inequalities are proliferating. Many of the initial schisms identified in 1995 are still relevant today. Twenty-five years later, foundational access inequalities continue to separate the digital haves and the digital have-nots within and across countries. In addition, even ubiquitous-access populations are riven with skill inequalities and differentiated usage. Indeed, legacy digital inequalities persist vis-à-vis economic class, gender, sexuality, race and ethnicity, aging, disability, healthcare, education, rural residency, networks, and global geographies. At the same time, emergent forms of inequality now appear alongside legacy inequalities such that notions of digital inequalities must be continually expanded to become more nuanced. We capture the increasingly complex and interrelated nature of digital inequalities by introducing the concept of the “digital inequality stack.” The concept of the digital inequality stack encompasses access to connectivity networks, devices, and software, as well as collective access to network infrastructure. Other layers of the digital inequality stack include differentiated use and consumption, literacies and skills, production and programming, etc. When inequality exists at foundational layers of the digital inequality stack, this often translates into inequalities at higher levels. As we show across these many thematic foci, layers in the digital inequality stack may move in tandem with one another such that all layers of the digital inequality stack reinforce disadvantage.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086779298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086779298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5210/FM.V25I7.10842
DO - 10.5210/FM.V25I7.10842
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85086779298
SN - 1396-0466
VL - 25
JO - First Monday
JF - First Monday
IS - 7
ER -