Abstract

Erosion of differential object marking (DOM)—the overt morphological marking of animate direct objects—has been observed in Spanish heritage speakers who are second-generation immigrants in the United States (Montrul 2004, Montrul & Bowles 2009). We investigated whether DOM is similarly vulnerable in heritage speakers of Hindi and Romanian, two other languages that also exhibit DOM, as well as in first-generation immigrants, adults who are presumably the main source of input to heritage speakers. We report the results of three experimental studies testing acceptability of DOM through a bimodal judgment task in first- and second-generation Spanish, Hindi, and Romanian speakers in the US and native speakers in Mexico, India, and Romania matched for age and socioeconomic status. Our results show structural changes with DOM in all of the heritage speaker groups to different degrees. Acceptance of nontarget DOM omission was more extensive in Spanish than in Hindi and Romanian. First-generation Hindi and Romanian immigrants did not differ in their grammatical proficiency and acceptance of DOM omission from the Hindi and Romanian speakers tested in India and in Romania. However, the first-generation Mexican immigrants displayed similar performance to the Spanish heritage speakers, suggesting that Spanish DOM is prone to L1 attrition in the first generation as well. We discuss linguistic and experiential factors relevant to the three languages and the three immigrant communities to explain these findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)564-610
Number of pages47
JournalLanguage
Volume91
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

first generation
language
immigrant
Romania
acceptance
India
Heritage Language
Differential Object Marking
structural change
erosion
social status
Mexico
Heritage Speakers
linguistics
Immigrants
community
performance
Group
Omission
Acceptance

Keywords

  • Attrition
  • Case
  • Heritage languages
  • Hindi
  • Romanian
  • Spanish

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Differential Object Marking in Spanish, Hindi, and Romanian as Heritage Languages. / Montrul, Silvina; Bhatt, Rakesh; Girju, Roxana.

In: Language, Vol. 91, No. 3, 01.09.2015, p. 564-610.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cdbd229bf7984d51b656147b1c49d0b0,
title = "Differential Object Marking in Spanish, Hindi, and Romanian as Heritage Languages",
abstract = "Erosion of differential object marking (DOM)—the overt morphological marking of animate direct objects—has been observed in Spanish heritage speakers who are second-generation immigrants in the United States (Montrul 2004, Montrul & Bowles 2009). We investigated whether DOM is similarly vulnerable in heritage speakers of Hindi and Romanian, two other languages that also exhibit DOM, as well as in first-generation immigrants, adults who are presumably the main source of input to heritage speakers. We report the results of three experimental studies testing acceptability of DOM through a bimodal judgment task in first- and second-generation Spanish, Hindi, and Romanian speakers in the US and native speakers in Mexico, India, and Romania matched for age and socioeconomic status. Our results show structural changes with DOM in all of the heritage speaker groups to different degrees. Acceptance of nontarget DOM omission was more extensive in Spanish than in Hindi and Romanian. First-generation Hindi and Romanian immigrants did not differ in their grammatical proficiency and acceptance of DOM omission from the Hindi and Romanian speakers tested in India and in Romania. However, the first-generation Mexican immigrants displayed similar performance to the Spanish heritage speakers, suggesting that Spanish DOM is prone to L1 attrition in the first generation as well. We discuss linguistic and experiential factors relevant to the three languages and the three immigrant communities to explain these findings.",
keywords = "Attrition, Case, Heritage languages, Hindi, Romanian, Spanish",
author = "Silvina Montrul and Rakesh Bhatt and Roxana Girju",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/lan.2015.0035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "564--610",
journal = "Language",
issn = "0097-8507",
publisher = "Linguistic Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential Object Marking in Spanish, Hindi, and Romanian as Heritage Languages

AU - Montrul, Silvina

AU - Bhatt, Rakesh

AU - Girju, Roxana

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Erosion of differential object marking (DOM)—the overt morphological marking of animate direct objects—has been observed in Spanish heritage speakers who are second-generation immigrants in the United States (Montrul 2004, Montrul & Bowles 2009). We investigated whether DOM is similarly vulnerable in heritage speakers of Hindi and Romanian, two other languages that also exhibit DOM, as well as in first-generation immigrants, adults who are presumably the main source of input to heritage speakers. We report the results of three experimental studies testing acceptability of DOM through a bimodal judgment task in first- and second-generation Spanish, Hindi, and Romanian speakers in the US and native speakers in Mexico, India, and Romania matched for age and socioeconomic status. Our results show structural changes with DOM in all of the heritage speaker groups to different degrees. Acceptance of nontarget DOM omission was more extensive in Spanish than in Hindi and Romanian. First-generation Hindi and Romanian immigrants did not differ in their grammatical proficiency and acceptance of DOM omission from the Hindi and Romanian speakers tested in India and in Romania. However, the first-generation Mexican immigrants displayed similar performance to the Spanish heritage speakers, suggesting that Spanish DOM is prone to L1 attrition in the first generation as well. We discuss linguistic and experiential factors relevant to the three languages and the three immigrant communities to explain these findings.

AB - Erosion of differential object marking (DOM)—the overt morphological marking of animate direct objects—has been observed in Spanish heritage speakers who are second-generation immigrants in the United States (Montrul 2004, Montrul & Bowles 2009). We investigated whether DOM is similarly vulnerable in heritage speakers of Hindi and Romanian, two other languages that also exhibit DOM, as well as in first-generation immigrants, adults who are presumably the main source of input to heritage speakers. We report the results of three experimental studies testing acceptability of DOM through a bimodal judgment task in first- and second-generation Spanish, Hindi, and Romanian speakers in the US and native speakers in Mexico, India, and Romania matched for age and socioeconomic status. Our results show structural changes with DOM in all of the heritage speaker groups to different degrees. Acceptance of nontarget DOM omission was more extensive in Spanish than in Hindi and Romanian. First-generation Hindi and Romanian immigrants did not differ in their grammatical proficiency and acceptance of DOM omission from the Hindi and Romanian speakers tested in India and in Romania. However, the first-generation Mexican immigrants displayed similar performance to the Spanish heritage speakers, suggesting that Spanish DOM is prone to L1 attrition in the first generation as well. We discuss linguistic and experiential factors relevant to the three languages and the three immigrant communities to explain these findings.

KW - Attrition

KW - Case

KW - Heritage languages

KW - Hindi

KW - Romanian

KW - Spanish

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942410073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942410073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/lan.2015.0035

DO - 10.1353/lan.2015.0035

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84942410073

VL - 91

SP - 564

EP - 610

JO - Language

JF - Language

SN - 0097-8507

IS - 3

ER -