Differential contributions of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex to self-projection and self-referential processing

Jake Kurczek, Emily Wechsler, Shreya Ahuja, Unni Jensen, Neal J. Cohen, Daniel Tranel, Melissa Duff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Converging evidence points to a neural network that supports a range of abilities including remembering the past, thinking about the future, and introspecting about oneself and others. Neuroimaging studies find hippocampal activation during event construction tasks, and patients with hippocampal amnesia are impaired in their ability to (re)construct events of the past and the future. Neuroimaging studies of constructed experiences similarly implicate the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), but it remains unknown whether the mPFC is critical for such processes. The current study compares performance of five patients with bilateral mPFC damage, six patients with bilateral hippocampal damage, and demographically matched comparison participants on an event construction task. Participants were given a neutral cue word and asked to (re)construct events across four time conditions: real past, imagined past, imagined present, and future. These event narratives were analyzed for the number of internal and external details to quantify the extent of episodic (re)experiencing. Given the literature on the involvement of the mPFC in self-referential processing, we also analyzed the event narratives for self-references. The patients with mPFC damage did not differ from healthy comparison participants in their ability to construct highly detailed episodic events across time periods but displayed disruptions in their incorporation of the self. Patients with hippocampal damage showed the opposite pattern; they were impaired in their ability to construct highly detailed episodic events across time periods but not in their incorporation of the self. The results suggest differential contributions of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex to the distributed neural network for various forms of self-projection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-126
Number of pages11
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume73
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Prefrontal Cortex
Hippocampus
Aptitude
Neuroimaging
Amnesia
Cues
Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • Hippocampus
  • MPFC
  • Memory
  • Self-projection
  • Self-referential processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Differential contributions of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex to self-projection and self-referential processing. / Kurczek, Jake; Wechsler, Emily; Ahuja, Shreya; Jensen, Unni; Cohen, Neal J.; Tranel, Daniel; Duff, Melissa.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 73, 01.07.2015, p. 116-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kurczek, Jake ; Wechsler, Emily ; Ahuja, Shreya ; Jensen, Unni ; Cohen, Neal J. ; Tranel, Daniel ; Duff, Melissa. / Differential contributions of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex to self-projection and self-referential processing. In: Neuropsychologia. 2015 ; Vol. 73. pp. 116-126.
@article{bbf403efd806422bae24411feea87c31,
title = "Differential contributions of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex to self-projection and self-referential processing",
abstract = "Converging evidence points to a neural network that supports a range of abilities including remembering the past, thinking about the future, and introspecting about oneself and others. Neuroimaging studies find hippocampal activation during event construction tasks, and patients with hippocampal amnesia are impaired in their ability to (re)construct events of the past and the future. Neuroimaging studies of constructed experiences similarly implicate the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), but it remains unknown whether the mPFC is critical for such processes. The current study compares performance of five patients with bilateral mPFC damage, six patients with bilateral hippocampal damage, and demographically matched comparison participants on an event construction task. Participants were given a neutral cue word and asked to (re)construct events across four time conditions: real past, imagined past, imagined present, and future. These event narratives were analyzed for the number of internal and external details to quantify the extent of episodic (re)experiencing. Given the literature on the involvement of the mPFC in self-referential processing, we also analyzed the event narratives for self-references. The patients with mPFC damage did not differ from healthy comparison participants in their ability to construct highly detailed episodic events across time periods but displayed disruptions in their incorporation of the self. Patients with hippocampal damage showed the opposite pattern; they were impaired in their ability to construct highly detailed episodic events across time periods but not in their incorporation of the self. The results suggest differential contributions of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex to the distributed neural network for various forms of self-projection.",
keywords = "Hippocampus, MPFC, Memory, Self-projection, Self-referential processing",
author = "Jake Kurczek and Emily Wechsler and Shreya Ahuja and Unni Jensen and Cohen, {Neal J.} and Daniel Tranel and Melissa Duff",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "116--126",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential contributions of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex to self-projection and self-referential processing

AU - Kurczek, Jake

AU - Wechsler, Emily

AU - Ahuja, Shreya

AU - Jensen, Unni

AU - Cohen, Neal J.

AU - Tranel, Daniel

AU - Duff, Melissa

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Converging evidence points to a neural network that supports a range of abilities including remembering the past, thinking about the future, and introspecting about oneself and others. Neuroimaging studies find hippocampal activation during event construction tasks, and patients with hippocampal amnesia are impaired in their ability to (re)construct events of the past and the future. Neuroimaging studies of constructed experiences similarly implicate the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), but it remains unknown whether the mPFC is critical for such processes. The current study compares performance of five patients with bilateral mPFC damage, six patients with bilateral hippocampal damage, and demographically matched comparison participants on an event construction task. Participants were given a neutral cue word and asked to (re)construct events across four time conditions: real past, imagined past, imagined present, and future. These event narratives were analyzed for the number of internal and external details to quantify the extent of episodic (re)experiencing. Given the literature on the involvement of the mPFC in self-referential processing, we also analyzed the event narratives for self-references. The patients with mPFC damage did not differ from healthy comparison participants in their ability to construct highly detailed episodic events across time periods but displayed disruptions in their incorporation of the self. Patients with hippocampal damage showed the opposite pattern; they were impaired in their ability to construct highly detailed episodic events across time periods but not in their incorporation of the self. The results suggest differential contributions of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex to the distributed neural network for various forms of self-projection.

AB - Converging evidence points to a neural network that supports a range of abilities including remembering the past, thinking about the future, and introspecting about oneself and others. Neuroimaging studies find hippocampal activation during event construction tasks, and patients with hippocampal amnesia are impaired in their ability to (re)construct events of the past and the future. Neuroimaging studies of constructed experiences similarly implicate the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), but it remains unknown whether the mPFC is critical for such processes. The current study compares performance of five patients with bilateral mPFC damage, six patients with bilateral hippocampal damage, and demographically matched comparison participants on an event construction task. Participants were given a neutral cue word and asked to (re)construct events across four time conditions: real past, imagined past, imagined present, and future. These event narratives were analyzed for the number of internal and external details to quantify the extent of episodic (re)experiencing. Given the literature on the involvement of the mPFC in self-referential processing, we also analyzed the event narratives for self-references. The patients with mPFC damage did not differ from healthy comparison participants in their ability to construct highly detailed episodic events across time periods but displayed disruptions in their incorporation of the self. Patients with hippocampal damage showed the opposite pattern; they were impaired in their ability to construct highly detailed episodic events across time periods but not in their incorporation of the self. The results suggest differential contributions of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex to the distributed neural network for various forms of self-projection.

KW - Hippocampus

KW - MPFC

KW - Memory

KW - Self-projection

KW - Self-referential processing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929611057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929611057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 25959213

AN - SCOPUS:84929611057

VL - 73

SP - 116

EP - 126

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

ER -