Differences in depressive symptoms between rural and urban Chinese labor force: The mediating effects of community factors

Wanlian Li, Fei Sun, Steven G Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine differences in depressive symptoms between urban and rural workers in mainland China and to identify community factors that could contribute to such residential differences. Methods: This study used nationally representative data from the 2014 China’s Labor Force Dynamic Survey. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews on a sample of 22,073 participants from 29 provinces of China, including 15,098 rural workers (Mage = 44.92, standard deviation (SD) = 14.85) and 6,975 urban workers (Mage = 43.28, SD = 13.62). Mediators included community cohesion, foreseeable community threat, supportive network size and medical benefit coverage. Mediation analyses were conducted using Hayes’ SPSS Macro Process for multiple mediators. Results: Urban participants reported fewer depressive symptoms than their rural counterparts. Lower levels of community cohesion, higher community foreseeable threat and poorer medical coverage were related to fewer depressive symptoms. Rural–urban differences were mediated by community cohesion (B = −0.12, p <.01), foreseeable community threat (B = −0.08, p <.01) and medical benefit coverage (B = 0.25, p <.01). Conclusion: This study sheds light on distinctive roles of community factors in explaining rural–urban differences in depressive symptoms. Policies or programs should be designed to promote strengths and address weaknesses in rural communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-325
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Social Psychiatry
Volume64
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Depression
China
Rural Population
Interviews

Keywords

  • Rural–urban disparities
  • community cohesion
  • community supportive network size
  • community threat
  • depressive symptoms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{11f825f52a66475080aa0bf44c09fb39,
title = "Differences in depressive symptoms between rural and urban Chinese labor force: The mediating effects of community factors",
abstract = "Purpose: This study aimed to examine differences in depressive symptoms between urban and rural workers in mainland China and to identify community factors that could contribute to such residential differences. Methods: This study used nationally representative data from the 2014 China’s Labor Force Dynamic Survey. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews on a sample of 22,073 participants from 29 provinces of China, including 15,098 rural workers (Mage = 44.92, standard deviation (SD) = 14.85) and 6,975 urban workers (Mage = 43.28, SD = 13.62). Mediators included community cohesion, foreseeable community threat, supportive network size and medical benefit coverage. Mediation analyses were conducted using Hayes’ SPSS Macro Process for multiple mediators. Results: Urban participants reported fewer depressive symptoms than their rural counterparts. Lower levels of community cohesion, higher community foreseeable threat and poorer medical coverage were related to fewer depressive symptoms. Rural–urban differences were mediated by community cohesion (B = −0.12, p <.01), foreseeable community threat (B = −0.08, p <.01) and medical benefit coverage (B = 0.25, p <.01). Conclusion: This study sheds light on distinctive roles of community factors in explaining rural–urban differences in depressive symptoms. Policies or programs should be designed to promote strengths and address weaknesses in rural communities.",
keywords = "Rural–urban disparities, community cohesion, community supportive network size, community threat, depressive symptoms",
author = "Wanlian Li and Fei Sun and Anderson, {Steven G}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0020764018754596",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "317--325",
journal = "International Journal of Social Psychiatry",
issn = "0020-7640",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in depressive symptoms between rural and urban Chinese labor force

T2 - The mediating effects of community factors

AU - Li, Wanlian

AU - Sun, Fei

AU - Anderson, Steven G

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to examine differences in depressive symptoms between urban and rural workers in mainland China and to identify community factors that could contribute to such residential differences. Methods: This study used nationally representative data from the 2014 China’s Labor Force Dynamic Survey. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews on a sample of 22,073 participants from 29 provinces of China, including 15,098 rural workers (Mage = 44.92, standard deviation (SD) = 14.85) and 6,975 urban workers (Mage = 43.28, SD = 13.62). Mediators included community cohesion, foreseeable community threat, supportive network size and medical benefit coverage. Mediation analyses were conducted using Hayes’ SPSS Macro Process for multiple mediators. Results: Urban participants reported fewer depressive symptoms than their rural counterparts. Lower levels of community cohesion, higher community foreseeable threat and poorer medical coverage were related to fewer depressive symptoms. Rural–urban differences were mediated by community cohesion (B = −0.12, p <.01), foreseeable community threat (B = −0.08, p <.01) and medical benefit coverage (B = 0.25, p <.01). Conclusion: This study sheds light on distinctive roles of community factors in explaining rural–urban differences in depressive symptoms. Policies or programs should be designed to promote strengths and address weaknesses in rural communities.

AB - Purpose: This study aimed to examine differences in depressive symptoms between urban and rural workers in mainland China and to identify community factors that could contribute to such residential differences. Methods: This study used nationally representative data from the 2014 China’s Labor Force Dynamic Survey. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews on a sample of 22,073 participants from 29 provinces of China, including 15,098 rural workers (Mage = 44.92, standard deviation (SD) = 14.85) and 6,975 urban workers (Mage = 43.28, SD = 13.62). Mediators included community cohesion, foreseeable community threat, supportive network size and medical benefit coverage. Mediation analyses were conducted using Hayes’ SPSS Macro Process for multiple mediators. Results: Urban participants reported fewer depressive symptoms than their rural counterparts. Lower levels of community cohesion, higher community foreseeable threat and poorer medical coverage were related to fewer depressive symptoms. Rural–urban differences were mediated by community cohesion (B = −0.12, p <.01), foreseeable community threat (B = −0.08, p <.01) and medical benefit coverage (B = 0.25, p <.01). Conclusion: This study sheds light on distinctive roles of community factors in explaining rural–urban differences in depressive symptoms. Policies or programs should be designed to promote strengths and address weaknesses in rural communities.

KW - Rural–urban disparities

KW - community cohesion

KW - community supportive network size

KW - community threat

KW - depressive symptoms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047158975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047158975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0020764018754596

DO - 10.1177/0020764018754596

M3 - Article

C2 - 29405813

AN - SCOPUS:85047158975

VL - 64

SP - 317

EP - 325

JO - International Journal of Social Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Social Psychiatry

SN - 0020-7640

IS - 4

ER -