Difference in utilization of assistive technology across two racial groups in the aging population

Shondra Loggins Clay, Reginald J Alston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background The utilization of assistive technology (AT) to enhance the quality of life has been well documented by disability researchers. However, the use across Black and White racial groups has been underexplored. Research Aim To update and extend the findings of Loggins et. al (Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 9(6): 487-92, 2014) by examining the relationship between race, assistive technology (AT) use, selected demographic variables, and access to health care. Methods Using the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) database, descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were estimated. Results Consistent with previous findings, a higher percentage of Blacks used AT (16.7%) compared to Whites (11.6%), and predictive factors of AT use were education, employment status, income level, health coverage, medical costs, and age. Blacks were 25% more likely to use AT compared to Whites; however, Whites who used AT had more favorable demographic identifiers (e.g. married, higher education, more employment, higher income, more health coverage, and fewer concerns with medical costs) compared to Blacks who used AT. In contrast to previous findings, gender was not statistically significant, users of AT have higher income levels, and there were differences in the magnitude of predictors. Conclusion Whites and Blacks still have the same predictors of AT use; however, there are still differences in the magnitude. Whereas gender was no longer found to be a significant predictor of AT use, marital status was statistically significant. This study highlights the disruption in the typical pattern of AT use among Whites and Blacks and future research should continue to monitor this changing trend in racial disparities and AT use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)206-214
Number of pages9
JournalGerontechnology
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Self-Help Devices
Aging of materials
Population
Education
Logistic Models
Demography
Health
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health Services Accessibility
Marital Status
Health care
Health Status
Logistics
Costs

Keywords

  • Assistive technology
  • Disabilities
  • Disparities
  • Race
  • Socioeconomic status (SES)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Difference in utilization of assistive technology across two racial groups in the aging population. / Clay, Shondra Loggins; Alston, Reginald J.

In: Gerontechnology, Vol. 17, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 206-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{23f18ad5b1d34a4ebffff2c5f096348b,
title = "Difference in utilization of assistive technology across two racial groups in the aging population",
abstract = "Background The utilization of assistive technology (AT) to enhance the quality of life has been well documented by disability researchers. However, the use across Black and White racial groups has been underexplored. Research Aim To update and extend the findings of Loggins et. al (Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 9(6): 487-92, 2014) by examining the relationship between race, assistive technology (AT) use, selected demographic variables, and access to health care. Methods Using the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) database, descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were estimated. Results Consistent with previous findings, a higher percentage of Blacks used AT (16.7{\%}) compared to Whites (11.6{\%}), and predictive factors of AT use were education, employment status, income level, health coverage, medical costs, and age. Blacks were 25{\%} more likely to use AT compared to Whites; however, Whites who used AT had more favorable demographic identifiers (e.g. married, higher education, more employment, higher income, more health coverage, and fewer concerns with medical costs) compared to Blacks who used AT. In contrast to previous findings, gender was not statistically significant, users of AT have higher income levels, and there were differences in the magnitude of predictors. Conclusion Whites and Blacks still have the same predictors of AT use; however, there are still differences in the magnitude. Whereas gender was no longer found to be a significant predictor of AT use, marital status was statistically significant. This study highlights the disruption in the typical pattern of AT use among Whites and Blacks and future research should continue to monitor this changing trend in racial disparities and AT use.",
keywords = "Assistive technology, Disabilities, Disparities, Race, Socioeconomic status (SES)",
author = "Clay, {Shondra Loggins} and Alston, {Reginald J}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4017/gt.2018.17.4.002.00",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "206--214",
journal = "Gerontechnology",
issn = "1569-1101",
publisher = "International Society for Gerontechnology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Difference in utilization of assistive technology across two racial groups in the aging population

AU - Clay, Shondra Loggins

AU - Alston, Reginald J

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Background The utilization of assistive technology (AT) to enhance the quality of life has been well documented by disability researchers. However, the use across Black and White racial groups has been underexplored. Research Aim To update and extend the findings of Loggins et. al (Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 9(6): 487-92, 2014) by examining the relationship between race, assistive technology (AT) use, selected demographic variables, and access to health care. Methods Using the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) database, descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were estimated. Results Consistent with previous findings, a higher percentage of Blacks used AT (16.7%) compared to Whites (11.6%), and predictive factors of AT use were education, employment status, income level, health coverage, medical costs, and age. Blacks were 25% more likely to use AT compared to Whites; however, Whites who used AT had more favorable demographic identifiers (e.g. married, higher education, more employment, higher income, more health coverage, and fewer concerns with medical costs) compared to Blacks who used AT. In contrast to previous findings, gender was not statistically significant, users of AT have higher income levels, and there were differences in the magnitude of predictors. Conclusion Whites and Blacks still have the same predictors of AT use; however, there are still differences in the magnitude. Whereas gender was no longer found to be a significant predictor of AT use, marital status was statistically significant. This study highlights the disruption in the typical pattern of AT use among Whites and Blacks and future research should continue to monitor this changing trend in racial disparities and AT use.

AB - Background The utilization of assistive technology (AT) to enhance the quality of life has been well documented by disability researchers. However, the use across Black and White racial groups has been underexplored. Research Aim To update and extend the findings of Loggins et. al (Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 9(6): 487-92, 2014) by examining the relationship between race, assistive technology (AT) use, selected demographic variables, and access to health care. Methods Using the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) database, descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were estimated. Results Consistent with previous findings, a higher percentage of Blacks used AT (16.7%) compared to Whites (11.6%), and predictive factors of AT use were education, employment status, income level, health coverage, medical costs, and age. Blacks were 25% more likely to use AT compared to Whites; however, Whites who used AT had more favorable demographic identifiers (e.g. married, higher education, more employment, higher income, more health coverage, and fewer concerns with medical costs) compared to Blacks who used AT. In contrast to previous findings, gender was not statistically significant, users of AT have higher income levels, and there were differences in the magnitude of predictors. Conclusion Whites and Blacks still have the same predictors of AT use; however, there are still differences in the magnitude. Whereas gender was no longer found to be a significant predictor of AT use, marital status was statistically significant. This study highlights the disruption in the typical pattern of AT use among Whites and Blacks and future research should continue to monitor this changing trend in racial disparities and AT use.

KW - Assistive technology

KW - Disabilities

KW - Disparities

KW - Race

KW - Socioeconomic status (SES)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059383178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059383178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4017/gt.2018.17.4.002.00

DO - 10.4017/gt.2018.17.4.002.00

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059383178

VL - 17

SP - 206

EP - 214

JO - Gerontechnology

JF - Gerontechnology

SN - 1569-1101

IS - 4

ER -