TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of Standardized Stream-Dwelling Crayfish Sampling Methods at Site and Drainage Scales
AU - Engelbert, Bryan S.
AU - Taylor, Christopher A.
AU - DiStefano, Robert J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) provided funding used to complete this project. We thank the senior author’s Graduate Advisory Committee members Robert Schooley (University of Illinois) and Yong Cao (INHS) for assistance in report review and study design. Robert Schooley, Yong Cao, and Sherry Gao (MDC) provided needed assistance with statistical test selection, design, and programming. We thank the many Missouri landowners who allowed us access. We are also grateful to the multiple anonymous reviewers whose significant time investment vastly improved the manuscript. We are grateful to Dan Wylie and Rachel Vinsel for their work in cataloging all of the vouchered specimens into the INHS Crayfish Collection. For assistance with graphics, we thank Mary Mabery. For field assistance, we thank Andrew Stites, Benjamin May, Ethan Kessler, Dan Wylie, Alex Loubere, Patrick Allison, Jr., Scott Cleary, Jordan Burr, and MDC personnel Emily Imhoff, Catlin Ames, Samantha Kircher, Dusty Swedberg, Jordan Murry, Shannon Amiot, and Lilly Qian.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, American Fisheries Society 2016.
PY - 2016/1/2
Y1 - 2016/1/2
N2 - Abstract: Methods for assessing stream fish, freshwater mussel, and insect assemblage structure, presence, and status have existed for several decades. Such methods are lacking for assessing crayfish. The current study addresses that deficiency by testing robust sampling methods to assess species richness, distribution, and density at both site and drainage scales. We tested the ability of timed search methods to capture all known species of crayfish at a site and of a kick seine to assess the mean density of crayfish (per m2) in riffles. Riparian crayfish burrows were excavated to capture additional species not captured with the other methods. Our data and methods allow for assessments of the inherent trade-off between sampling time and resources and statistical confidence. An example sampling regime of 3.5 h of effort per site required seven 15-min timed search samples and captured at least 80% of the crayfish species richness, with 85% confidence across all sites tested. Twelve kick-seine samples yielded crayfish density estimates within 50% of an estimated true density at 70% confidence for all species with densities >0.5/m2. In the drainage-scale component, we employed a sampling effort prescription derived from our site-scale data across seven drainages in Missouri. To achieve 100% of the species richness sampled at 97.5% confidence in wadeable second- to fourth-order streams, researchers will need to sample one site for every 18 river kilometers of second- to fourth-order streams occurring in a drainage. We believe our methods can provide a repeatable and statistically supported tool for researchers assessing crayfish assemblages in wadeable streams across the Midwest. Received March 9, 2015; accepted October 14, 2015
AB - Abstract: Methods for assessing stream fish, freshwater mussel, and insect assemblage structure, presence, and status have existed for several decades. Such methods are lacking for assessing crayfish. The current study addresses that deficiency by testing robust sampling methods to assess species richness, distribution, and density at both site and drainage scales. We tested the ability of timed search methods to capture all known species of crayfish at a site and of a kick seine to assess the mean density of crayfish (per m2) in riffles. Riparian crayfish burrows were excavated to capture additional species not captured with the other methods. Our data and methods allow for assessments of the inherent trade-off between sampling time and resources and statistical confidence. An example sampling regime of 3.5 h of effort per site required seven 15-min timed search samples and captured at least 80% of the crayfish species richness, with 85% confidence across all sites tested. Twelve kick-seine samples yielded crayfish density estimates within 50% of an estimated true density at 70% confidence for all species with densities >0.5/m2. In the drainage-scale component, we employed a sampling effort prescription derived from our site-scale data across seven drainages in Missouri. To achieve 100% of the species richness sampled at 97.5% confidence in wadeable second- to fourth-order streams, researchers will need to sample one site for every 18 river kilometers of second- to fourth-order streams occurring in a drainage. We believe our methods can provide a repeatable and statistically supported tool for researchers assessing crayfish assemblages in wadeable streams across the Midwest. Received March 9, 2015; accepted October 14, 2015
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959355276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959355276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02755947.2015.1111277
DO - 10.1080/02755947.2015.1111277
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84959355276
SN - 0275-5947
VL - 36
SP - 104
EP - 115
JO - North American Journal of Fisheries Management
JF - North American Journal of Fisheries Management
IS - 1
ER -