TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and testing of a sedation scale for use in Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus)
AU - Raulic, Juliette
AU - Leung, Vivian S.Y.
AU - Doss, Grayson A.
AU - Graham, Jennifer E.
AU - Keller, Krista A.
AU - Mans, Christoph
AU - Sadar, Miranda J.
AU - Vergneau-Grosset, Claire
AU - Pang, Daniel S.J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant (ID: 424022-2013) and the Fondation Lévesque (DSJ Pang). The funders had no role in study
Funding Information:
We thank the following for technical support: the Farms and Animal Facility Division (University of Montreal), Dr Fr?d?rik Rousseau-Blass, and Dr Margaux Fardel, who contributed to the project. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant (ID: 424022-2013) and the Fondation L?vesque (DSJ Pang). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2021 by the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - In biomedical research, rabbits are commonly sedated to facilitate a variety of procedures. Developing a sedation assessment scale enables standardization of levels of sedation and comparisons of sedation protocols, and may help in predicting sedation level requirements for different procedures. The goal of this study was to develop a rabbit sedation assessment scale using a psychometric approach. We hypothesized that the sedation scale would have construct validity, good internal consistency, and reliability. In a prospective, randomized, blinded study design, 15 (8 females, 7 males) healthy 1-y-old New Zealand white rabbits received 3 intramuscular treatments: midazolam (0.5 mg/kg; n = 6); midazolam (1.5 mg/kg)-ketamine (5 mg/kg; n = 7); and alfaxalone (4 mg/kg)-dexmedetomidine (0.1 mg/kg)-midazolam (0.2 mg/kg; n = 3). One rabbit received 2 treatments. A sedation scale was developed by using psychometric methods, with assessment performed by 6 independent raters who were blind to treatment. Final sedation scale items included posture, palpebral reflex, orbital tightening, lateral recumbency, loss of righting reflex, supraglottic airway device placement, toe pinch, and general appearance. The scale showed construct validity, good to very good interrater reliability for individual items (6 raters; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.671 to 0.940), very good intrarater reliability (5 raters; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.951 to 0.987), and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α, 0.947). The sedation scale performed well under the conditions tested, suggesting that it can be applied in a wider range of settings (different populations, raters, sedation protocols).
AB - In biomedical research, rabbits are commonly sedated to facilitate a variety of procedures. Developing a sedation assessment scale enables standardization of levels of sedation and comparisons of sedation protocols, and may help in predicting sedation level requirements for different procedures. The goal of this study was to develop a rabbit sedation assessment scale using a psychometric approach. We hypothesized that the sedation scale would have construct validity, good internal consistency, and reliability. In a prospective, randomized, blinded study design, 15 (8 females, 7 males) healthy 1-y-old New Zealand white rabbits received 3 intramuscular treatments: midazolam (0.5 mg/kg; n = 6); midazolam (1.5 mg/kg)-ketamine (5 mg/kg; n = 7); and alfaxalone (4 mg/kg)-dexmedetomidine (0.1 mg/kg)-midazolam (0.2 mg/kg; n = 3). One rabbit received 2 treatments. A sedation scale was developed by using psychometric methods, with assessment performed by 6 independent raters who were blind to treatment. Final sedation scale items included posture, palpebral reflex, orbital tightening, lateral recumbency, loss of righting reflex, supraglottic airway device placement, toe pinch, and general appearance. The scale showed construct validity, good to very good interrater reliability for individual items (6 raters; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.671 to 0.940), very good intrarater reliability (5 raters; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.951 to 0.987), and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α, 0.947). The sedation scale performed well under the conditions tested, suggesting that it can be applied in a wider range of settings (different populations, raters, sedation protocols).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117944042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85117944042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000002
DO - 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000002
M3 - Article
C2 - 34429187
AN - SCOPUS:85117944042
VL - 60
SP - 549
EP - 555
JO - Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
JF - Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
SN - 1559-6109
IS - 5
ER -