Detecting DIF for polytomously scored items: An adaptation of the SIBTEST procedure

Hua Hua Chang, John Mazzeo, Louis Roussos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Shealy and Stout (1993) proposed a DIF detection procedure called SIBTEST and demonstrated its utility with both simulated and real data sets. Current versions of SIBTEST can be used only for dichotomous items. In this article, an extension to handle polytomous items is developed. Two simulation studies are presented which compare the modified SIBTESTprocedure with the Mantel and standardized mean difference (SMD) procedures. The first study compares the procedures under conditions in which the Mantel and SMD procedures have been shown to perform well (Zwick, Donoghue, & Grima. 1993). Results of Study 1 suggest that SIBTEST performed reasonably well, but that the Mantel and SMD procedures performed slightly better. The second study uses data simulated under conditions in which observed-score DIF methods for dichotomous items have not performed well. The results of Study 2 indicate that under these conditions the modified SIBTEST procedure provides better control of impact-induced Type I error inflation than the other procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-353
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Educational Measurement
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detecting DIF for polytomously scored items: An adaptation of the SIBTEST procedure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this