TY - JOUR
T1 - Detecting changes in novel, complex three-dimensional objects
AU - Williams, Pepper
AU - Simons, Daniel J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Please address all correspondence to P. Williams, Dept. of Psychology, UMass-Boston, 1000 Morrissey Blvd., Boston MA 02125. Email: [email protected] We thank Ryan Bowse for his help in executing Experiments 2–4 and Lauren Dubbick for her help with Experiment 3. The stimui useld in these experimens arte available from the world-wide web at http://psych.umb.edu/williams/stimuli/. PW was supported by a UMass-Boston Healey Grant, and D.S. was supported by NSF grant SBR-9809366.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Four experiments assessed change detection performance for displays consisting of a single, novel, multipart object, leading to several new findings. First, larger changes (involving more object parts) were more difficult to detect than smaller changes. Second, change detection performance for displays of a temporarily occluded moving object was no more or less sensitive than detection performance for displays of static objects disappearing and reappearing; however, item analyses did indicate that detection may have been based on different representations in these two situations. Third, training observers to recognize objects before the detection task had no measurable effect on sensitivity levels, but induced different biases depending on the training conditions. Finally, some participants' performance revealed implicit change detection on trials in which they explicitly responded that they saw no change.
AB - Four experiments assessed change detection performance for displays consisting of a single, novel, multipart object, leading to several new findings. First, larger changes (involving more object parts) were more difficult to detect than smaller changes. Second, change detection performance for displays of a temporarily occluded moving object was no more or less sensitive than detection performance for displays of static objects disappearing and reappearing; however, item analyses did indicate that detection may have been based on different representations in these two situations. Third, training observers to recognize objects before the detection task had no measurable effect on sensitivity levels, but induced different biases depending on the training conditions. Finally, some participants' performance revealed implicit change detection on trials in which they explicitly responded that they saw no change.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034039595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034039595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/135062800394829
DO - 10.1080/135062800394829
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0034039595
SN - 1350-6285
VL - 7
SP - 297
EP - 322
JO - Visual Cognition
JF - Visual Cognition
IS - 1-3
ER -