Detecting changes in novel, complex three-dimensional objects

Pepper Williams, Daniel J. Simons

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Four experiments assessed change detection performance for displays consisting of a single, novel, multipart object, leading to several new findings. First, larger changes (involving more object parts) were more difficult to detect than smaller changes. Second, change detection performance for displays of a temporarily occluded moving object was no more or less sensitive than detection performance for displays of static objects disappearing and reappearing; however, item analyses did indicate that detection may have been based on different representations in these two situations. Third, training observers to recognize objects before the detection task had no measurable effect on sensitivity levels, but induced different biases depending on the training conditions. Finally, some participants' performance revealed implicit change detection on trials in which they explicitly responded that they saw no change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)297-322
Number of pages26
JournalVisual Cognition
Volume7
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Three-dimensional
Change Detection
Observer
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Detecting changes in novel, complex three-dimensional objects. / Williams, Pepper; Simons, Daniel J.

In: Visual Cognition, Vol. 7, No. 1-3, 01.01.2000, p. 297-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{d6de07b2cbe94922acbef261dbcedf5d,
title = "Detecting changes in novel, complex three-dimensional objects",
abstract = "Four experiments assessed change detection performance for displays consisting of a single, novel, multipart object, leading to several new findings. First, larger changes (involving more object parts) were more difficult to detect than smaller changes. Second, change detection performance for displays of a temporarily occluded moving object was no more or less sensitive than detection performance for displays of static objects disappearing and reappearing; however, item analyses did indicate that detection may have been based on different representations in these two situations. Third, training observers to recognize objects before the detection task had no measurable effect on sensitivity levels, but induced different biases depending on the training conditions. Finally, some participants' performance revealed implicit change detection on trials in which they explicitly responded that they saw no change.",
author = "Pepper Williams and Simons, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/135062800394829",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "297--322",
journal = "Visual Cognition",
issn = "1350-6285",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detecting changes in novel, complex three-dimensional objects

AU - Williams, Pepper

AU - Simons, Daniel J.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Four experiments assessed change detection performance for displays consisting of a single, novel, multipart object, leading to several new findings. First, larger changes (involving more object parts) were more difficult to detect than smaller changes. Second, change detection performance for displays of a temporarily occluded moving object was no more or less sensitive than detection performance for displays of static objects disappearing and reappearing; however, item analyses did indicate that detection may have been based on different representations in these two situations. Third, training observers to recognize objects before the detection task had no measurable effect on sensitivity levels, but induced different biases depending on the training conditions. Finally, some participants' performance revealed implicit change detection on trials in which they explicitly responded that they saw no change.

AB - Four experiments assessed change detection performance for displays consisting of a single, novel, multipart object, leading to several new findings. First, larger changes (involving more object parts) were more difficult to detect than smaller changes. Second, change detection performance for displays of a temporarily occluded moving object was no more or less sensitive than detection performance for displays of static objects disappearing and reappearing; however, item analyses did indicate that detection may have been based on different representations in these two situations. Third, training observers to recognize objects before the detection task had no measurable effect on sensitivity levels, but induced different biases depending on the training conditions. Finally, some participants' performance revealed implicit change detection on trials in which they explicitly responded that they saw no change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034039595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034039595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/135062800394829

DO - 10.1080/135062800394829

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0034039595

VL - 7

SP - 297

EP - 322

JO - Visual Cognition

JF - Visual Cognition

SN - 1350-6285

IS - 1-3

ER -