TY - JOUR
T1 - Design of a High-Rate Wastewater Treatment Process for Energy and Water Recovery at Biorefineries
AU - Li, Yalin
AU - Kontos, George A.
AU - Cabrera, Daniela V.
AU - Avila, Nickolas M.
AU - Parkinson, Thomas W.
AU - Viswanathan, Mothi Bharath
AU - Singh, Vijay
AU - Altpeter, Fredy
AU - Labatut, Rodrigo A.
AU - Guest, Jeremy S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by the DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation (U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research under Award Number DE-SC0018420). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Energy.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.
PY - 2023/3/6
Y1 - 2023/3/6
N2 - Industrial wastewaters rich in organic carbon have potential for value generation, but conventional, low-rate, anaerobic-aerobic wastewater treatment (WWT) processes often incur significant capital expenses and energy consumption. In this study, we leveraged experimental data for biorefinery-derived wastewaters to characterize the implications of transitioning from a conventional, low-rate process to a high-rate, multistage anaerobic process. We designed and simulated these WWT processes across seven first- and second-generation (1G/2G) biorefineries and evaluated the implications for biorefinery sustainability through techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA). Compared to the conventional design, the new process can substantially reduce capital costs and electricity usage. These improvements were particularly evident for 2G biorefineries, translating to 5%-13% lower minimum product selling prices (MPSPs) and 7%-135% lower 100-year global warming potentials (GWPs; the 135% reduction is due to the transition of one biorefinery from net emission [0.87 kg of CO2e·gal-1] to net sequestration [−0.31 kg of CO2e·gal-1]). Biorefineries could further reduce the MPSP through the renewable identification number (RIN) credits by upgrading and selling the biogas as renewable natural gas, but at the expense of increasing GWP. When normalized, the COD management cost ranged from $-56 to $465 per tonne of COD, indicating that wastewater could be a net source of revenue for some biorefineries.
AB - Industrial wastewaters rich in organic carbon have potential for value generation, but conventional, low-rate, anaerobic-aerobic wastewater treatment (WWT) processes often incur significant capital expenses and energy consumption. In this study, we leveraged experimental data for biorefinery-derived wastewaters to characterize the implications of transitioning from a conventional, low-rate process to a high-rate, multistage anaerobic process. We designed and simulated these WWT processes across seven first- and second-generation (1G/2G) biorefineries and evaluated the implications for biorefinery sustainability through techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA). Compared to the conventional design, the new process can substantially reduce capital costs and electricity usage. These improvements were particularly evident for 2G biorefineries, translating to 5%-13% lower minimum product selling prices (MPSPs) and 7%-135% lower 100-year global warming potentials (GWPs; the 135% reduction is due to the transition of one biorefinery from net emission [0.87 kg of CO2e·gal-1] to net sequestration [−0.31 kg of CO2e·gal-1]). Biorefineries could further reduce the MPSP through the renewable identification number (RIN) credits by upgrading and selling the biogas as renewable natural gas, but at the expense of increasing GWP. When normalized, the COD management cost ranged from $-56 to $465 per tonne of COD, indicating that wastewater could be a net source of revenue for some biorefineries.
KW - anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR)
KW - biochemical methane potential (BMP)
KW - high-strength wastewater
KW - internal circulation (IC) reactor
KW - life cycle assessment (LCA)
KW - life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
KW - renewable identification number (RIN)
KW - techno-economic analysis (TEA)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148867262&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85148867262&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c07139
DO - 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c07139
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85148867262
SN - 2168-0485
VL - 11
SP - 3861
EP - 3872
JO - ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
JF - ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
IS - 9
ER -