TY - GEN
T1 - Design decision tradeoffs for environmental impact and end of life recovery of Cellphones
AU - Joseph, Aaron T.
AU - Schreiner, James H.
AU - Thurston, Deborah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2015 by ASME.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Tradeoff decision making is a difficult problem in design, and even more so when designing for the product lifecycle. Tradeoffs must be made among a broader set of issues, including environmental impact. In addition, normative methods such as utility analysis can become more difficult to implement because of decision modeling issues. This paper presents formal, normative methods for overcoming these difficulties. The method includes a lifecycle analysis which reveals elements of the cellphone design that are most impactful on the environment. A baseline estimate of impacts provides insight into possible redesign options based on minimization of negative environmental impacts. The proposed method also employs a multiattribute utility copula approach, which can be useful when the condition of utility independence is not easily satisfied when formulating a multiattribute utility function. An example using the decision process for end of life (EOL) processing alternatives for cellphones illustrates the method. The extraction of sub-Assemblies was determined to be the best decision alternative to recapture value at the disposal stage of the product lifecycle. The copula structure is shown to be effective in analyzing a firm's tradeoff preferences as well as attribute valuation, providing a straightforward tool for tradeoff decision making.
AB - Tradeoff decision making is a difficult problem in design, and even more so when designing for the product lifecycle. Tradeoffs must be made among a broader set of issues, including environmental impact. In addition, normative methods such as utility analysis can become more difficult to implement because of decision modeling issues. This paper presents formal, normative methods for overcoming these difficulties. The method includes a lifecycle analysis which reveals elements of the cellphone design that are most impactful on the environment. A baseline estimate of impacts provides insight into possible redesign options based on minimization of negative environmental impacts. The proposed method also employs a multiattribute utility copula approach, which can be useful when the condition of utility independence is not easily satisfied when formulating a multiattribute utility function. An example using the decision process for end of life (EOL) processing alternatives for cellphones illustrates the method. The extraction of sub-Assemblies was determined to be the best decision alternative to recapture value at the disposal stage of the product lifecycle. The copula structure is shown to be effective in analyzing a firm's tradeoff preferences as well as attribute valuation, providing a straightforward tool for tradeoff decision making.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978955309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978955309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/DETC2015-46769
DO - 10.1115/DETC2015-46769
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84978955309
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
BT - 20th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference; 9th International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2015
Y2 - 2 August 2015 through 5 August 2015
ER -