TY - JOUR
T1 - Design and testing of an intra-row mechanical weeding machine for corn
AU - Cordill, C.
AU - Grift, T. E.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011/11
Y1 - 2011/11
N2 - As an alternative to chemical weed control, mechanical weed control between crop rows can be achieved using standard tools such as field cultivators. This paper addresses the related problem of achieving mechanical intra-row weed control in maize. The object was to non-specifically remove weed plants within the row by enabling dual tine carriers to engage the soil whilst circumventing the maize stalks. The maize stalks were distinguished from the weeds and maize leaves by utilising 1) the typical vertical quasi-cylindrical stalk of the maize plant, 2) the limited range of maize stalk diameters, and 3) by assuming constant plant spacing. To assess the performance of the machine, a video was taken during field plot experiments. This allowed determination of the number of plants that were "fatally damaged" after inadvertently being pushed over by the implement. This was assumed to cause the plant to die, or "minimally damaged" where the implement merely touched the plant, when the plant was assumed to survive. Experiments were carried out using three arrangements being 1) three rows without weeds, 2) three rows with broadleaf weeds (simulated by planting soybean) and 3) three rows with grassy weeds. The percentage of plants that were fatally damaged was 8.8%, 23.7%, and 23.7% in cases 1, 2, 3 respectively. In addition, the percentage of plants that were minimally damaged was 17.6%, 20%, and 25.9% in cases 1, 2,3 respectively.
AB - As an alternative to chemical weed control, mechanical weed control between crop rows can be achieved using standard tools such as field cultivators. This paper addresses the related problem of achieving mechanical intra-row weed control in maize. The object was to non-specifically remove weed plants within the row by enabling dual tine carriers to engage the soil whilst circumventing the maize stalks. The maize stalks were distinguished from the weeds and maize leaves by utilising 1) the typical vertical quasi-cylindrical stalk of the maize plant, 2) the limited range of maize stalk diameters, and 3) by assuming constant plant spacing. To assess the performance of the machine, a video was taken during field plot experiments. This allowed determination of the number of plants that were "fatally damaged" after inadvertently being pushed over by the implement. This was assumed to cause the plant to die, or "minimally damaged" where the implement merely touched the plant, when the plant was assumed to survive. Experiments were carried out using three arrangements being 1) three rows without weeds, 2) three rows with broadleaf weeds (simulated by planting soybean) and 3) three rows with grassy weeds. The percentage of plants that were fatally damaged was 8.8%, 23.7%, and 23.7% in cases 1, 2, 3 respectively. In addition, the percentage of plants that were minimally damaged was 17.6%, 20%, and 25.9% in cases 1, 2,3 respectively.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053979331&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053979331&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.07.007
DO - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.07.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80053979331
SN - 1537-5110
VL - 110
SP - 247
EP - 252
JO - Biosystems Engineering
JF - Biosystems Engineering
IS - 3
ER -