Desalination and long-haul water transfer a case study of the energy-water nexus in Texas

Ashlynn S. Stillwell, Carey W. King, Michael E. Webber

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Energy and water are interrelated. We use water for energy, for example to cool thermoelectric power generation and produce liquid fuels. Conversely, we use energy for the collection, treatment, disinfection, and distribution of water and wastewater. In the water sector, strain on existing water supplies, population growth, and the push toward stricter water and wastewater treatment standards potentially leads to more energy-intensive water. Treating water to more stringent potable standards requires additional energy beyond conventional treatment. Additionally, as existing water supplies become increasingly strained in some locations, water planners turn to alternative options to quench cities' thirst. Among these options for inland cities is desalination of seawater followed by long-haul water transfer. Though many desalination technologies exist to treat seawater to potable standards, reverse osmosis membranes are the most common technology in use because of their cost-effectiveness and productivity as compared with more traditional techniques such as multi-effect distillation. [1] However, the high pressures required for reverse osmosis make desalination a very energy-intensive water supply option. The subsequent conveyance of desalinated water through long-haul pipelines also requires large amounts of energy. Even for local water production, 85% of the energy required for standard surface water treatment goes toward water distribution, and so adding in long-haul will only increase this requirement. [2] To examine desalination and long-haul transfer as a drinking water supply option, Texas was chosen as a test-bed with desalination near Houston and long-haul transfer to the rapidly-growing Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. Various pipeline routes were modeled to simulate options for long-haul desalinated water transfer. Elevation change over the route of the long-haul transfer pipeline was determined using a digital elevation model of the state of Texas. These elevation data were then used to calculate energy requirements for water pumping with standard assumptions for pump performance, efficiency, and rating. Combining these energy requirements with the energy demands for desalination provides an estimate of this option as a water supply for Dallas-Fort Worth. Results suggest that desalination and long-haul transfer as a drinking water supply is 9 to 23 times more energy-intensive per unit of water than conventional treatment of local surface water sources, an increase of 230 to 630 megawatt-hours per day for 20 million gallons. Ensuring adequate water supplies for the future is important, as is developing these water supplies in a sustainable manner. The energy-intensity of desalination and long-haul transfer as a drinking water supply suggests this option is not a sustainable water or energy policy decision if other less energy-intensive options exist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the ASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability 2009, ES2009
Pages1029-1036
Number of pages8
Volume1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
EventASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability, ES2009 - San Francisco, CA, United States

Other

OtherASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability, ES2009
CountryUnited States
CitySan Francisco, CA
Period7/19/097/23/09

Fingerprint

Water
Desalination
Water supply
Potable water
Pipelines
Reverse osmosis
Water treatment
Surface waters
Seawater
Osmosis membranes
Energy policy
Disinfection
Thermoelectric power
Liquid fuels
Cost effectiveness
Distillation
Wastewater treatment
Power generation
Wastewater
Productivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

Stillwell, A. S., King, C. W., & Webber, M. E. (2009). Desalination and long-haul water transfer a case study of the energy-water nexus in Texas. In Proceedings of the ASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability 2009, ES2009 (Vol. 1, pp. 1029-1036). DOI: 10.1115/ES2009-90237

Desalination and long-haul water transfer a case study of the energy-water nexus in Texas. / Stillwell, Ashlynn S.; King, Carey W.; Webber, Michael E.

Proceedings of the ASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability 2009, ES2009. Vol. 1 2009. p. 1029-1036.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Stillwell, AS, King, CW & Webber, ME 2009, Desalination and long-haul water transfer a case study of the energy-water nexus in Texas. in Proceedings of the ASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability 2009, ES2009. vol. 1, pp. 1029-1036, ASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability, ES2009, San Francisco, CA, United States, 19-23 July. DOI: 10.1115/ES2009-90237
Stillwell AS, King CW, Webber ME. Desalination and long-haul water transfer a case study of the energy-water nexus in Texas. In Proceedings of the ASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability 2009, ES2009. Vol. 1. 2009. p. 1029-1036. Available from, DOI: 10.1115/ES2009-90237

Stillwell, Ashlynn S.; King, Carey W.; Webber, Michael E. / Desalination and long-haul water transfer a case study of the energy-water nexus in Texas.

Proceedings of the ASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability 2009, ES2009. Vol. 1 2009. p. 1029-1036.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

@inbook{bd9223e6562541aba18622a32821175c,
title = "Desalination and long-haul water transfer a case study of the energy-water nexus in Texas",
abstract = "Energy and water are interrelated. We use water for energy, for example to cool thermoelectric power generation and produce liquid fuels. Conversely, we use energy for the collection, treatment, disinfection, and distribution of water and wastewater. In the water sector, strain on existing water supplies, population growth, and the push toward stricter water and wastewater treatment standards potentially leads to more energy-intensive water. Treating water to more stringent potable standards requires additional energy beyond conventional treatment. Additionally, as existing water supplies become increasingly strained in some locations, water planners turn to alternative options to quench cities' thirst. Among these options for inland cities is desalination of seawater followed by long-haul water transfer. Though many desalination technologies exist to treat seawater to potable standards, reverse osmosis membranes are the most common technology in use because of their cost-effectiveness and productivity as compared with more traditional techniques such as multi-effect distillation. [1] However, the high pressures required for reverse osmosis make desalination a very energy-intensive water supply option. The subsequent conveyance of desalinated water through long-haul pipelines also requires large amounts of energy. Even for local water production, 85% of the energy required for standard surface water treatment goes toward water distribution, and so adding in long-haul will only increase this requirement. [2] To examine desalination and long-haul transfer as a drinking water supply option, Texas was chosen as a test-bed with desalination near Houston and long-haul transfer to the rapidly-growing Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. Various pipeline routes were modeled to simulate options for long-haul desalinated water transfer. Elevation change over the route of the long-haul transfer pipeline was determined using a digital elevation model of the state of Texas. These elevation data were then used to calculate energy requirements for water pumping with standard assumptions for pump performance, efficiency, and rating. Combining these energy requirements with the energy demands for desalination provides an estimate of this option as a water supply for Dallas-Fort Worth. Results suggest that desalination and long-haul transfer as a drinking water supply is 9 to 23 times more energy-intensive per unit of water than conventional treatment of local surface water sources, an increase of 230 to 630 megawatt-hours per day for 20 million gallons. Ensuring adequate water supplies for the future is important, as is developing these water supplies in a sustainable manner. The energy-intensity of desalination and long-haul transfer as a drinking water supply suggests this option is not a sustainable water or energy policy decision if other less energy-intensive options exist.",
author = "Stillwell, {Ashlynn S.} and King, {Carey W.} and Webber, {Michael E.}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1115/ES2009-90237",
isbn = "9780791848890",
volume = "1",
pages = "1029--1036",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the ASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability 2009, ES2009",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Desalination and long-haul water transfer a case study of the energy-water nexus in Texas

AU - Stillwell,Ashlynn S.

AU - King,Carey W.

AU - Webber,Michael E.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Energy and water are interrelated. We use water for energy, for example to cool thermoelectric power generation and produce liquid fuels. Conversely, we use energy for the collection, treatment, disinfection, and distribution of water and wastewater. In the water sector, strain on existing water supplies, population growth, and the push toward stricter water and wastewater treatment standards potentially leads to more energy-intensive water. Treating water to more stringent potable standards requires additional energy beyond conventional treatment. Additionally, as existing water supplies become increasingly strained in some locations, water planners turn to alternative options to quench cities' thirst. Among these options for inland cities is desalination of seawater followed by long-haul water transfer. Though many desalination technologies exist to treat seawater to potable standards, reverse osmosis membranes are the most common technology in use because of their cost-effectiveness and productivity as compared with more traditional techniques such as multi-effect distillation. [1] However, the high pressures required for reverse osmosis make desalination a very energy-intensive water supply option. The subsequent conveyance of desalinated water through long-haul pipelines also requires large amounts of energy. Even for local water production, 85% of the energy required for standard surface water treatment goes toward water distribution, and so adding in long-haul will only increase this requirement. [2] To examine desalination and long-haul transfer as a drinking water supply option, Texas was chosen as a test-bed with desalination near Houston and long-haul transfer to the rapidly-growing Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. Various pipeline routes were modeled to simulate options for long-haul desalinated water transfer. Elevation change over the route of the long-haul transfer pipeline was determined using a digital elevation model of the state of Texas. These elevation data were then used to calculate energy requirements for water pumping with standard assumptions for pump performance, efficiency, and rating. Combining these energy requirements with the energy demands for desalination provides an estimate of this option as a water supply for Dallas-Fort Worth. Results suggest that desalination and long-haul transfer as a drinking water supply is 9 to 23 times more energy-intensive per unit of water than conventional treatment of local surface water sources, an increase of 230 to 630 megawatt-hours per day for 20 million gallons. Ensuring adequate water supplies for the future is important, as is developing these water supplies in a sustainable manner. The energy-intensity of desalination and long-haul transfer as a drinking water supply suggests this option is not a sustainable water or energy policy decision if other less energy-intensive options exist.

AB - Energy and water are interrelated. We use water for energy, for example to cool thermoelectric power generation and produce liquid fuels. Conversely, we use energy for the collection, treatment, disinfection, and distribution of water and wastewater. In the water sector, strain on existing water supplies, population growth, and the push toward stricter water and wastewater treatment standards potentially leads to more energy-intensive water. Treating water to more stringent potable standards requires additional energy beyond conventional treatment. Additionally, as existing water supplies become increasingly strained in some locations, water planners turn to alternative options to quench cities' thirst. Among these options for inland cities is desalination of seawater followed by long-haul water transfer. Though many desalination technologies exist to treat seawater to potable standards, reverse osmosis membranes are the most common technology in use because of their cost-effectiveness and productivity as compared with more traditional techniques such as multi-effect distillation. [1] However, the high pressures required for reverse osmosis make desalination a very energy-intensive water supply option. The subsequent conveyance of desalinated water through long-haul pipelines also requires large amounts of energy. Even for local water production, 85% of the energy required for standard surface water treatment goes toward water distribution, and so adding in long-haul will only increase this requirement. [2] To examine desalination and long-haul transfer as a drinking water supply option, Texas was chosen as a test-bed with desalination near Houston and long-haul transfer to the rapidly-growing Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. Various pipeline routes were modeled to simulate options for long-haul desalinated water transfer. Elevation change over the route of the long-haul transfer pipeline was determined using a digital elevation model of the state of Texas. These elevation data were then used to calculate energy requirements for water pumping with standard assumptions for pump performance, efficiency, and rating. Combining these energy requirements with the energy demands for desalination provides an estimate of this option as a water supply for Dallas-Fort Worth. Results suggest that desalination and long-haul transfer as a drinking water supply is 9 to 23 times more energy-intensive per unit of water than conventional treatment of local surface water sources, an increase of 230 to 630 megawatt-hours per day for 20 million gallons. Ensuring adequate water supplies for the future is important, as is developing these water supplies in a sustainable manner. The energy-intensity of desalination and long-haul transfer as a drinking water supply suggests this option is not a sustainable water or energy policy decision if other less energy-intensive options exist.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953740055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953740055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/ES2009-90237

DO - 10.1115/ES2009-90237

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780791848890

VL - 1

SP - 1029

EP - 1036

BT - Proceedings of the ASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability 2009, ES2009

ER -