TY - JOUR
T1 - Depression screening in youth
T2 - Multi-informant algorithms for the child welfare setting
AU - Thakur, Hena
AU - Cohen, Joseph R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study includes data from the National Survey on Child and Adolescent Well-Being-II (NSCAW-II). NSCAW-II was sponsored by the Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The data were provided by the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) represents the most widely used protocol for mental and behavioral health screening in the Child Welfare System (CWS). However, because past studies have (a) relied on the self-or parent report, (b) focused on the internalizing subscales, (c) focused solely on current or prospective depression, and (d) not assessed incremental validity, it is difficult to use the ASEBA to address recommended universal depression screening initiatives in the CWS. In response, the present study used an evidence-based medicine (EBM) framework to identify the best combination of subscales that predict adolescent depression outcomes within the CWS. Overall, we found that a combination of self-reported internalizing symptoms, and to a lesser extent, self-reported attention problems, delinquent behavior, and parent-reported social problems best forecasted concurrent depression status. Meanwhile, self-reported anxious/depressed and externalizing symptoms, in addition to parent-reported somatic complaints and withdrawn symptoms, were necessary to adequately forecast prospective depression outcomes. Using these algorithms, we were able to differentiate and classify youth at minimal, moderate, or substantial risk for current and future depression symptoms. Findings are contextualized with past research on the Achenbach scales and clinical implications for more targeted depression screening are discussed.
AB - The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) represents the most widely used protocol for mental and behavioral health screening in the Child Welfare System (CWS). However, because past studies have (a) relied on the self-or parent report, (b) focused on the internalizing subscales, (c) focused solely on current or prospective depression, and (d) not assessed incremental validity, it is difficult to use the ASEBA to address recommended universal depression screening initiatives in the CWS. In response, the present study used an evidence-based medicine (EBM) framework to identify the best combination of subscales that predict adolescent depression outcomes within the CWS. Overall, we found that a combination of self-reported internalizing symptoms, and to a lesser extent, self-reported attention problems, delinquent behavior, and parent-reported social problems best forecasted concurrent depression status. Meanwhile, self-reported anxious/depressed and externalizing symptoms, in addition to parent-reported somatic complaints and withdrawn symptoms, were necessary to adequately forecast prospective depression outcomes. Using these algorithms, we were able to differentiate and classify youth at minimal, moderate, or substantial risk for current and future depression symptoms. Findings are contextualized with past research on the Achenbach scales and clinical implications for more targeted depression screening are discussed.
KW - ASEBA
KW - Depression
KW - Incremental validity
KW - Pediatric
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064894086&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064894086&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/pas0000728
DO - 10.1037/pas0000728
M3 - Article
C2 - 31033314
AN - SCOPUS:85064894086
SN - 1040-3590
VL - 31
SP - 1028
EP - 1039
JO - Psychological Assessment
JF - Psychological Assessment
IS - 8
ER -