TY - JOUR
T1 - Denitrifying Bioreactor In Situ Woodchip Bulk Density
AU - Christianson, Laura
AU - Christianson, Reid
AU - Díaz-García, Carolina
AU - Johnson, Gabriel
AU - Maxwell, Bryan
AU - Cooke, Richard A C
AU - Wickramarathne, Niranga
AU - Gentry, Lowell
N1 - The authors thank the many funders who made this large-scale work possible, with primary funding from the USDA NRCS (NR185A12XXXXC004 CESU under the Great Rivers Umbrella Agreement 68-3A75-18-518 504). Additional funding for specific study locations was provided by: Illinois Nutrient Research and Education Council (#2017-4-360498-302; #2022-GENTRY: “Do soil caps enhance bioreactor performance and increase woodchip longevity?”); USEPA grant number 00D87719; USDA NCR-SARE FNC21-1279; and the Illinois Farm Bureau Bioreactor Partnership (Illinois Farm Bureau, Illinois Land Improvement Contractors Association, Illinois NRCS). CDG’s time was funded by a USDA NRCS CIG (NR213A750013G038) and IL NREC (#2021-3-360498-144). This product was developed with support from the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program, which is funded by the USDA-NIFA. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed within do not necessarily reflect the view of the SARE program or the USDA. Mention of companies and manufacturers’ names does not imply endorsement by the USDA. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Most importantly, we thank the four private farmers involved who graciously allowed us to do this work.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Woodchip bulk density in a denitrifying bioreactor governs system hydraulics, but this prime physical attribute has never been estimated in situ. The objectives were twofold: (1) to establish estimates of in situ woodchip bulk density at bioreactors in the field, and (2) evaluate causal factors for and resulting impacts of these estimates. Proof-of-concept bulk density methods were developed at a pilot-scale bioreactor using three ways to estimate volume: surveying the excavated area, pumping the excavation full through a flow meter, and using iPhone Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). These methods were then further tested at two new and three old full-size bioreactors. Additional ex situ (off-site) testing with the associated woodchips included analysis of bulk density along a moisture gradient and particle size, particle density, wood composition, and hydraulic property testing. In situ dry bulk densities based on the entire volume of the new bioreactors (206-224 kg/m3) were similar to values from previous lab-scale studies. In situ estimates for woodchips at the bottom of aged bioreactors (22-mo. to 6-y) were unexpectedly low (120-166 kg/m3), given that these woodchips would presumably be the most compacted. These low moisture-content corrected dry bulk densities were influenced by high moisture contents in situ (>70% wet basis). The impacts of particle size and particle density on bulk density were somewhat mixed across the dataset, but in general, smaller woodchips had higher dry bulk densities than larger, and several woodchips sourced from the bottom of bioreactors had low particle densities. Although dry bulk densities in the zone of flow in bioreactors in the field were shown to be relatively low, the resulting permeability coefficients under those packing conditions did not differ from those of the original woodchips. The LiDAR-based volume estimation method was the most practical for large-scale, full-size evaluations and allowed high precision with small features (e.g., vertical reactor edges, drainage fittings).
AB - Woodchip bulk density in a denitrifying bioreactor governs system hydraulics, but this prime physical attribute has never been estimated in situ. The objectives were twofold: (1) to establish estimates of in situ woodchip bulk density at bioreactors in the field, and (2) evaluate causal factors for and resulting impacts of these estimates. Proof-of-concept bulk density methods were developed at a pilot-scale bioreactor using three ways to estimate volume: surveying the excavated area, pumping the excavation full through a flow meter, and using iPhone Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). These methods were then further tested at two new and three old full-size bioreactors. Additional ex situ (off-site) testing with the associated woodchips included analysis of bulk density along a moisture gradient and particle size, particle density, wood composition, and hydraulic property testing. In situ dry bulk densities based on the entire volume of the new bioreactors (206-224 kg/m3) were similar to values from previous lab-scale studies. In situ estimates for woodchips at the bottom of aged bioreactors (22-mo. to 6-y) were unexpectedly low (120-166 kg/m3), given that these woodchips would presumably be the most compacted. These low moisture-content corrected dry bulk densities were influenced by high moisture contents in situ (>70% wet basis). The impacts of particle size and particle density on bulk density were somewhat mixed across the dataset, but in general, smaller woodchips had higher dry bulk densities than larger, and several woodchips sourced from the bottom of bioreactors had low particle densities. Although dry bulk densities in the zone of flow in bioreactors in the field were shown to be relatively low, the resulting permeability coefficients under those packing conditions did not differ from those of the original woodchips. The LiDAR-based volume estimation method was the most practical for large-scale, full-size evaluations and allowed high precision with small features (e.g., vertical reactor edges, drainage fittings).
KW - Compaction
KW - Cone penetrometer
KW - Drainable porosity
KW - LiDAR
KW - Moisture content
KW - Survey
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85159785614
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85159785614#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.13031/ja.15364
DO - 10.13031/ja.15364
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85159785614
SN - 2769-3295
VL - 66
SP - 723
EP - 734
JO - Journal of the ASABE
JF - Journal of the ASABE
IS - 3
ER -