Defining spatial comparison metrics for evaluation of paleoclimatic field reconstructions of the Common Era

Bo Li, Jason E. Smerdon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Climate field reconstructions (CFR) of the Common Era (the last two millennia) provide important insights into the dynamics of past climate change that, in turn, have implications for the future. Multiple CFR methods have emerged in the literature, and comparisons between these methods using pseudoproxy experiments have been performed. These experiments, however, have not fully quantified the spatial skill of the CFRs, particularly with regard to the relative performance of each. Toward such ends, a formal statistical hypothesis test is proposed as a means of evaluating the differences between two random fields that integrate the differences in both the mean and the dependence structure. This involves a careful selection of the statistical model for the CFR residual process and systematic comparisons over different spatial scales. Application of this method yields a systematic assessment of the spatial character of five widely applied CFRs in a pseudoproxy experiment context. The analyses indicate that spatial differences among the five CFRs are not statistically significant. Further rigorous statistical assessments will help elucidate the strength and weakness of each CFR method, while quantifying the degree to which their spatial dissimilarities can be ascribed to methodological choices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)394-406
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmetrics
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Climate
Metric
Evaluation
climate
experiment
Experiment
Dependence Structure
Hypothesis Test
Climate Change
Dissimilarity
Statistical test
Random Field
Statistical Model
climate change
Integrate
comparison
evaluation
method

Keywords

  • Climate field reconstruction
  • Paleoclimate
  • Pseudoproxy experiment
  • Random field comparison

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Ecological Modeling

Cite this

Defining spatial comparison metrics for evaluation of paleoclimatic field reconstructions of the Common Era. / Li, Bo; Smerdon, Jason E.

In: Environmetrics, Vol. 23, No. 5, 01.08.2012, p. 394-406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{140e4b2681b445a9ae5a6989abee2d88,
title = "Defining spatial comparison metrics for evaluation of paleoclimatic field reconstructions of the Common Era",
abstract = "Climate field reconstructions (CFR) of the Common Era (the last two millennia) provide important insights into the dynamics of past climate change that, in turn, have implications for the future. Multiple CFR methods have emerged in the literature, and comparisons between these methods using pseudoproxy experiments have been performed. These experiments, however, have not fully quantified the spatial skill of the CFRs, particularly with regard to the relative performance of each. Toward such ends, a formal statistical hypothesis test is proposed as a means of evaluating the differences between two random fields that integrate the differences in both the mean and the dependence structure. This involves a careful selection of the statistical model for the CFR residual process and systematic comparisons over different spatial scales. Application of this method yields a systematic assessment of the spatial character of five widely applied CFRs in a pseudoproxy experiment context. The analyses indicate that spatial differences among the five CFRs are not statistically significant. Further rigorous statistical assessments will help elucidate the strength and weakness of each CFR method, while quantifying the degree to which their spatial dissimilarities can be ascribed to methodological choices.",
keywords = "Climate field reconstruction, Paleoclimate, Pseudoproxy experiment, Random field comparison",
author = "Bo Li and Smerdon, {Jason E.}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/env.2142",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "394--406",
journal = "Environmetrics",
issn = "1180-4009",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining spatial comparison metrics for evaluation of paleoclimatic field reconstructions of the Common Era

AU - Li, Bo

AU - Smerdon, Jason E.

PY - 2012/8/1

Y1 - 2012/8/1

N2 - Climate field reconstructions (CFR) of the Common Era (the last two millennia) provide important insights into the dynamics of past climate change that, in turn, have implications for the future. Multiple CFR methods have emerged in the literature, and comparisons between these methods using pseudoproxy experiments have been performed. These experiments, however, have not fully quantified the spatial skill of the CFRs, particularly with regard to the relative performance of each. Toward such ends, a formal statistical hypothesis test is proposed as a means of evaluating the differences between two random fields that integrate the differences in both the mean and the dependence structure. This involves a careful selection of the statistical model for the CFR residual process and systematic comparisons over different spatial scales. Application of this method yields a systematic assessment of the spatial character of five widely applied CFRs in a pseudoproxy experiment context. The analyses indicate that spatial differences among the five CFRs are not statistically significant. Further rigorous statistical assessments will help elucidate the strength and weakness of each CFR method, while quantifying the degree to which their spatial dissimilarities can be ascribed to methodological choices.

AB - Climate field reconstructions (CFR) of the Common Era (the last two millennia) provide important insights into the dynamics of past climate change that, in turn, have implications for the future. Multiple CFR methods have emerged in the literature, and comparisons between these methods using pseudoproxy experiments have been performed. These experiments, however, have not fully quantified the spatial skill of the CFRs, particularly with regard to the relative performance of each. Toward such ends, a formal statistical hypothesis test is proposed as a means of evaluating the differences between two random fields that integrate the differences in both the mean and the dependence structure. This involves a careful selection of the statistical model for the CFR residual process and systematic comparisons over different spatial scales. Application of this method yields a systematic assessment of the spatial character of five widely applied CFRs in a pseudoproxy experiment context. The analyses indicate that spatial differences among the five CFRs are not statistically significant. Further rigorous statistical assessments will help elucidate the strength and weakness of each CFR method, while quantifying the degree to which their spatial dissimilarities can be ascribed to methodological choices.

KW - Climate field reconstruction

KW - Paleoclimate

KW - Pseudoproxy experiment

KW - Random field comparison

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868615560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868615560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/env.2142

DO - 10.1002/env.2142

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84868615560

VL - 23

SP - 394

EP - 406

JO - Environmetrics

JF - Environmetrics

SN - 1180-4009

IS - 5

ER -