Deer hunters’ disease risk sensitivity over time

Jerry J. Vaske, Craig A Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Risk sensitivity is a predisposition to rate all risks as large. Miller and Shelby (2009) examined hunters’ risk sensitivity relative to chronic wasting disease (CWD), Mad cow, E. coli, Salmonella, Lyme disease, and West Nile virus (WNV). This article replicated their analysis and compared risk sensitivity over time. Data from Illinois hunters in 2004 (n = 1,879) and 2012 (n = 3,391) showed the “no risk” cluster reported the lowest risks across all six diseases, the “moderate risk” segment always had the highest risks, and the “slight risk” group was in between. Perceived risks declined over time for CWD, Mad cow, WNV, and Lyme disease. For E. coli and Salmonella, risks increased. Collectively, however, these hunters became slightly more risk sensitive, as the proportion in the most risk sensitive group (“moderate risk”) increased (19% in 2004, 26% in 2012) while the least risk sensitive group (“no risk”) decreased (24%, 20%).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-230
Number of pages14
JournalHuman Dimensions of Wildlife
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2019

Fingerprint

deer
chronic wasting disease
Lyme disease
West Nile virus

Keywords

  • Hunters
  • disease
  • perceived risk
  • risk sensitivity
  • wildlife

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Deer hunters’ disease risk sensitivity over time. / Vaske, Jerry J.; Miller, Craig A.

In: Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol. 24, No. 3, 04.05.2019, p. 217-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{76a710c28c854022b2f6ff6c9995462f,
title = "Deer hunters’ disease risk sensitivity over time",
abstract = "Risk sensitivity is a predisposition to rate all risks as large. Miller and Shelby (2009) examined hunters’ risk sensitivity relative to chronic wasting disease (CWD), Mad cow, E. coli, Salmonella, Lyme disease, and West Nile virus (WNV). This article replicated their analysis and compared risk sensitivity over time. Data from Illinois hunters in 2004 (n = 1,879) and 2012 (n = 3,391) showed the “no risk” cluster reported the lowest risks across all six diseases, the “moderate risk” segment always had the highest risks, and the “slight risk” group was in between. Perceived risks declined over time for CWD, Mad cow, WNV, and Lyme disease. For E. coli and Salmonella, risks increased. Collectively, however, these hunters became slightly more risk sensitive, as the proportion in the most risk sensitive group (“moderate risk”) increased (19{\%} in 2004, 26{\%} in 2012) while the least risk sensitive group (“no risk”) decreased (24{\%}, 20{\%}).",
keywords = "Hunters, disease, perceived risk, risk sensitivity, wildlife",
author = "Vaske, {Jerry J.} and Miller, {Craig A}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10871209.2019.1587650",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "217--230",
journal = "Human Dimensions of Wildlife",
issn = "1087-1209",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deer hunters’ disease risk sensitivity over time

AU - Vaske, Jerry J.

AU - Miller, Craig A

PY - 2019/5/4

Y1 - 2019/5/4

N2 - Risk sensitivity is a predisposition to rate all risks as large. Miller and Shelby (2009) examined hunters’ risk sensitivity relative to chronic wasting disease (CWD), Mad cow, E. coli, Salmonella, Lyme disease, and West Nile virus (WNV). This article replicated their analysis and compared risk sensitivity over time. Data from Illinois hunters in 2004 (n = 1,879) and 2012 (n = 3,391) showed the “no risk” cluster reported the lowest risks across all six diseases, the “moderate risk” segment always had the highest risks, and the “slight risk” group was in between. Perceived risks declined over time for CWD, Mad cow, WNV, and Lyme disease. For E. coli and Salmonella, risks increased. Collectively, however, these hunters became slightly more risk sensitive, as the proportion in the most risk sensitive group (“moderate risk”) increased (19% in 2004, 26% in 2012) while the least risk sensitive group (“no risk”) decreased (24%, 20%).

AB - Risk sensitivity is a predisposition to rate all risks as large. Miller and Shelby (2009) examined hunters’ risk sensitivity relative to chronic wasting disease (CWD), Mad cow, E. coli, Salmonella, Lyme disease, and West Nile virus (WNV). This article replicated their analysis and compared risk sensitivity over time. Data from Illinois hunters in 2004 (n = 1,879) and 2012 (n = 3,391) showed the “no risk” cluster reported the lowest risks across all six diseases, the “moderate risk” segment always had the highest risks, and the “slight risk” group was in between. Perceived risks declined over time for CWD, Mad cow, WNV, and Lyme disease. For E. coli and Salmonella, risks increased. Collectively, however, these hunters became slightly more risk sensitive, as the proportion in the most risk sensitive group (“moderate risk”) increased (19% in 2004, 26% in 2012) while the least risk sensitive group (“no risk”) decreased (24%, 20%).

KW - Hunters

KW - disease

KW - perceived risk

KW - risk sensitivity

KW - wildlife

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062993228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062993228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10871209.2019.1587650

DO - 10.1080/10871209.2019.1587650

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062993228

VL - 24

SP - 217

EP - 230

JO - Human Dimensions of Wildlife

JF - Human Dimensions of Wildlife

SN - 1087-1209

IS - 3

ER -