Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This study compares two mutually exclusive models of small group decision making processes. The unitary sequence model—the classical model of decision development—assumes that all groups follow the same sequence of phases. The alternative, the multiple sequence model, assumes that different groups follow different sequences. The models were tested with data from two sets of groups: student groups performing a ranking task and groups of physicians performing a program planning task. Results of the study support the multiple sequence model and suggest revisions in current theories of decision development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalCommunication Monographs
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1981

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics


Dive into the research topics of 'Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this