Data use within an education-centered cross-sector collaboration

Donald Hackmann, Joel R. Malin, Joonkil Ahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine data use practices within a cross-sector initiative involving high school career academies. It discerns how partners used data to assess the public value of academies and address equity concerns. Design/methodology/approach: A case study methodology was applied to examine cross-sector activities supporting the district’s career academy reform. Data were collected through interviews, observations and document analysis. Datnow and Park’s (2018) conceptual framework involving key equity dimensions guided the analysis. Findings: Partners used data for both accountability and continuous improvement. Educators were required to document student growth for state accountability purposes, while providing evidence of the public value of the academies to the community. Data use for continuous improvement included identifying annual goals to improve academy performance. There was a lack of a district-wide focus on equity, with educators taking a passive approach to academy and career pathway selections by student subgroups. Practical implications: The findings provide insights into data use practices school and district leaders can implement to ensure equitable student participation in career academies and appropriate data use within cross-sector collaborations. Social implications: Students who are traditionally underrepresented in career fields, including students of color and females, need intentional efforts to encourage their participation in high-skill, high-wage career fields. Originality/value: This study identifies critical issues involved with data use for equity when promoting education-centered cross-sector collaboration, while also highlighting existing tensions between data use for accountability and continuous improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)118-133
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Educational Administration
Volume57
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 8 2019

Fingerprint

academy
education
career
equity
district
student
responsibility
educator
school career
Values
participation
document analysis
methodology
wage
leader
reform
lack
interview
school
community

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • College and career readiness
  • Cross-sector collaboration
  • Data use
  • Educational reform
  • Equity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Data use within an education-centered cross-sector collaboration. / Hackmann, Donald; Malin, Joel R.; Ahn, Joonkil.

In: Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 57, No. 2, 08.04.2019, p. 118-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hackmann, Donald ; Malin, Joel R. ; Ahn, Joonkil. / Data use within an education-centered cross-sector collaboration. In: Journal of Educational Administration. 2019 ; Vol. 57, No. 2. pp. 118-133.
@article{d73ea14523e2428ba1d33ba314af4892,
title = "Data use within an education-centered cross-sector collaboration",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine data use practices within a cross-sector initiative involving high school career academies. It discerns how partners used data to assess the public value of academies and address equity concerns. Design/methodology/approach: A case study methodology was applied to examine cross-sector activities supporting the district’s career academy reform. Data were collected through interviews, observations and document analysis. Datnow and Park’s (2018) conceptual framework involving key equity dimensions guided the analysis. Findings: Partners used data for both accountability and continuous improvement. Educators were required to document student growth for state accountability purposes, while providing evidence of the public value of the academies to the community. Data use for continuous improvement included identifying annual goals to improve academy performance. There was a lack of a district-wide focus on equity, with educators taking a passive approach to academy and career pathway selections by student subgroups. Practical implications: The findings provide insights into data use practices school and district leaders can implement to ensure equitable student participation in career academies and appropriate data use within cross-sector collaborations. Social implications: Students who are traditionally underrepresented in career fields, including students of color and females, need intentional efforts to encourage their participation in high-skill, high-wage career fields. Originality/value: This study identifies critical issues involved with data use for equity when promoting education-centered cross-sector collaboration, while also highlighting existing tensions between data use for accountability and continuous improvement.",
keywords = "Accountability, College and career readiness, Cross-sector collaboration, Data use, Educational reform, Equity",
author = "Donald Hackmann and Malin, {Joel R.} and Joonkil Ahn",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1108/JEA-08-2018-0150",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "118--133",
journal = "Journal of Educational Administration",
issn = "0957-8234",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Data use within an education-centered cross-sector collaboration

AU - Hackmann, Donald

AU - Malin, Joel R.

AU - Ahn, Joonkil

PY - 2019/4/8

Y1 - 2019/4/8

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine data use practices within a cross-sector initiative involving high school career academies. It discerns how partners used data to assess the public value of academies and address equity concerns. Design/methodology/approach: A case study methodology was applied to examine cross-sector activities supporting the district’s career academy reform. Data were collected through interviews, observations and document analysis. Datnow and Park’s (2018) conceptual framework involving key equity dimensions guided the analysis. Findings: Partners used data for both accountability and continuous improvement. Educators were required to document student growth for state accountability purposes, while providing evidence of the public value of the academies to the community. Data use for continuous improvement included identifying annual goals to improve academy performance. There was a lack of a district-wide focus on equity, with educators taking a passive approach to academy and career pathway selections by student subgroups. Practical implications: The findings provide insights into data use practices school and district leaders can implement to ensure equitable student participation in career academies and appropriate data use within cross-sector collaborations. Social implications: Students who are traditionally underrepresented in career fields, including students of color and females, need intentional efforts to encourage their participation in high-skill, high-wage career fields. Originality/value: This study identifies critical issues involved with data use for equity when promoting education-centered cross-sector collaboration, while also highlighting existing tensions between data use for accountability and continuous improvement.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine data use practices within a cross-sector initiative involving high school career academies. It discerns how partners used data to assess the public value of academies and address equity concerns. Design/methodology/approach: A case study methodology was applied to examine cross-sector activities supporting the district’s career academy reform. Data were collected through interviews, observations and document analysis. Datnow and Park’s (2018) conceptual framework involving key equity dimensions guided the analysis. Findings: Partners used data for both accountability and continuous improvement. Educators were required to document student growth for state accountability purposes, while providing evidence of the public value of the academies to the community. Data use for continuous improvement included identifying annual goals to improve academy performance. There was a lack of a district-wide focus on equity, with educators taking a passive approach to academy and career pathway selections by student subgroups. Practical implications: The findings provide insights into data use practices school and district leaders can implement to ensure equitable student participation in career academies and appropriate data use within cross-sector collaborations. Social implications: Students who are traditionally underrepresented in career fields, including students of color and females, need intentional efforts to encourage their participation in high-skill, high-wage career fields. Originality/value: This study identifies critical issues involved with data use for equity when promoting education-centered cross-sector collaboration, while also highlighting existing tensions between data use for accountability and continuous improvement.

KW - Accountability

KW - College and career readiness

KW - Cross-sector collaboration

KW - Data use

KW - Educational reform

KW - Equity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061716586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061716586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JEA-08-2018-0150

DO - 10.1108/JEA-08-2018-0150

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 118

EP - 133

JO - Journal of Educational Administration

JF - Journal of Educational Administration

SN - 0957-8234

IS - 2

ER -