TY - JOUR
T1 - Dam Removal Express Assessment Models (DREAM). Part 1
T2 - Model development and validation
AU - Cui, Yantao
AU - Parker, Gary
AU - Braudrick, Christian
AU - Dietrich, William E.
AU - Cluer, Brian
N1 - Funding Information:
Model development was partially supported by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Funding to Stillwater Sciences, the University of Minnesota and University of California, Berkeley that directly or indirectly benefited the development of the current models was provided by the following sources: Portland General Electric (PGE), PacifiCorp, National Science Foundation (NSF), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Aviation and Space Administration (NASA), Ok Tedi Mining Limited (OTML) and the St. Johns River Water Management District, Florida. We thank Drs. Marcelo Garcia (U Illinois), Thomas Lisle (USFS), James Pizzuto (U Delaware) and Stephen Wiele (USGS), whose reviews to the Marmot Dam removal modeling sparked many improvements in the development of the current models. Many Stillwater employees contributed to the development of the models: Andrew Wilcox (now with Colorado State University), Frank Ligon, Jennifer Vick (now with McBain and Trush), John O’Brien (now with US Forest Service) and Bruce Orr. Peter Downs reviewed an earlier draft and provided many useful suggestions. This paper is a contribution of the National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics (NCED) based at St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, in which the University of California, Berkeley participates, and of which Stillwater Sciences, Berkeley, California is a partner. The useful suggestions from two anonymous reviewers have been incorporated into the manuscript.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Many dams have been removed in the recent decades in the U.S. for reasons including economics, safety, and ecological rehabilitation. More dams are under consideration for removal; some of them are medium to large-sized dams filled with millions of cubic meters of sediment. Reaching a decision to remove a dam and deciding as how the dam should be removed, however, are usually not easy, especially for medium to large-sized dams. One of the major reasons for the difficulty in decision-making is the lack of understanding of the consequences of the release of reservoir sediment downstream, or alternatively the large expense if the sediment is to be removed by dredging. This paper summarizes the Dam Removal Express Assessment Models (DREAM) developed at Stillwater Sciences, Berkeley, California for simulation of sediment transport following dam removal. There are two models in the package: DREAM-1 simulates sediment transport following the removal of a dam behind which the reservoir deposit is composed primarily of non-cohesive sand and silt, and DREAM-2 simulates sediment transport following the removal of a dam behind which the upper layer of the reservoir deposit is composed primarily of gravel. Both models are one-dimensional and simulate cross-sectionally and reach averaged sediment aggradation and degradation following dam removal. DREAM-1 is validated with a set of laboratory experiments; its reservoir erosion module is applied to the Lake Mills drawdown experiment. DREAM-2 is validated with the field data for a natural landslide. Sensitivity tests are conducted with a series of sample runs in the companion paper, Cui et al. (2006), to validate some of the assumptions in the model and to provide guidance in field data collection in actual dam removal projects.
AB - Many dams have been removed in the recent decades in the U.S. for reasons including economics, safety, and ecological rehabilitation. More dams are under consideration for removal; some of them are medium to large-sized dams filled with millions of cubic meters of sediment. Reaching a decision to remove a dam and deciding as how the dam should be removed, however, are usually not easy, especially for medium to large-sized dams. One of the major reasons for the difficulty in decision-making is the lack of understanding of the consequences of the release of reservoir sediment downstream, or alternatively the large expense if the sediment is to be removed by dredging. This paper summarizes the Dam Removal Express Assessment Models (DREAM) developed at Stillwater Sciences, Berkeley, California for simulation of sediment transport following dam removal. There are two models in the package: DREAM-1 simulates sediment transport following the removal of a dam behind which the reservoir deposit is composed primarily of non-cohesive sand and silt, and DREAM-2 simulates sediment transport following the removal of a dam behind which the upper layer of the reservoir deposit is composed primarily of gravel. Both models are one-dimensional and simulate cross-sectionally and reach averaged sediment aggradation and degradation following dam removal. DREAM-1 is validated with a set of laboratory experiments; its reservoir erosion module is applied to the Lake Mills drawdown experiment. DREAM-2 is validated with the field data for a natural landslide. Sensitivity tests are conducted with a series of sample runs in the companion paper, Cui et al. (2006), to validate some of the assumptions in the model and to provide guidance in field data collection in actual dam removal projects.
KW - Dam decommissioning
KW - Dam removal
KW - Numerical model
KW - Sediment transport
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746930895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746930895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00221686.2006.9521683
DO - 10.1080/00221686.2006.9521683
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33746930895
SN - 0022-1686
VL - 44
SP - 291
EP - 307
JO - Journal of Hydraulic Research
JF - Journal of Hydraulic Research
IS - 3
ER -