Current approaches to change blindness

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Across saccades, blinks, blank screens, movie cuts, and other interruptions, observers fail to detect substantial changes to the visual details of objects and scenes. This inability to spot changes ('change blindness') is the focus of this special issue of Visual Cognition. This introductory paper briefly reviews recent studies of change blindness, noting the relation of these findings to earlier research and discussing the inferences we can draw from them. Most explanations of change blindness assume that we fail to detect changes because the changed display masks or overwrites the initial display. Here I draw a distinction between intentional and incidental change detection tasks and consider how alternatives to the 'overwriting' explanation may provide better explanations for change blindness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalVisual Cognition
Volume7
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Blindness
Saccades
Motion Pictures
Masks
Cognition
Change Blindness
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Current approaches to change blindness. / Simons, Daniel J.

In: Visual Cognition, Vol. 7, No. 1-3, 01.01.2000, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{a00b14e8a74f45ce8611b6464402d336,
title = "Current approaches to change blindness",
abstract = "Across saccades, blinks, blank screens, movie cuts, and other interruptions, observers fail to detect substantial changes to the visual details of objects and scenes. This inability to spot changes ('change blindness') is the focus of this special issue of Visual Cognition. This introductory paper briefly reviews recent studies of change blindness, noting the relation of these findings to earlier research and discussing the inferences we can draw from them. Most explanations of change blindness assume that we fail to detect changes because the changed display masks or overwrites the initial display. Here I draw a distinction between intentional and incidental change detection tasks and consider how alternatives to the 'overwriting' explanation may provide better explanations for change blindness.",
author = "Simons, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/135062800394658",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Visual Cognition",
issn = "1350-6285",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current approaches to change blindness

AU - Simons, Daniel J.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Across saccades, blinks, blank screens, movie cuts, and other interruptions, observers fail to detect substantial changes to the visual details of objects and scenes. This inability to spot changes ('change blindness') is the focus of this special issue of Visual Cognition. This introductory paper briefly reviews recent studies of change blindness, noting the relation of these findings to earlier research and discussing the inferences we can draw from them. Most explanations of change blindness assume that we fail to detect changes because the changed display masks or overwrites the initial display. Here I draw a distinction between intentional and incidental change detection tasks and consider how alternatives to the 'overwriting' explanation may provide better explanations for change blindness.

AB - Across saccades, blinks, blank screens, movie cuts, and other interruptions, observers fail to detect substantial changes to the visual details of objects and scenes. This inability to spot changes ('change blindness') is the focus of this special issue of Visual Cognition. This introductory paper briefly reviews recent studies of change blindness, noting the relation of these findings to earlier research and discussing the inferences we can draw from them. Most explanations of change blindness assume that we fail to detect changes because the changed display masks or overwrites the initial display. Here I draw a distinction between intentional and incidental change detection tasks and consider how alternatives to the 'overwriting' explanation may provide better explanations for change blindness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034048152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034048152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/135062800394658

DO - 10.1080/135062800394658

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0034048152

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Visual Cognition

JF - Visual Cognition

SN - 1350-6285

IS - 1-3

ER -