Crossing boundaries, building power: Chicago organizers embrace race, ideology, and coalition

Jacob Lesniewski, Marc J Doussard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Community organizing emerged as a coherent mode of intervention under conditions of postwar Fordism, a set of economic and political conditions that have changed substantially. The three critiques of classic organizing models, built by Saul Alinsky and subsequently adapted by others, point to the need to cross formal, informal, and conceptual boundaries. To date, little is known about whether, and to what end, organizers take up the proposals of these critiques. This article responds to this empirical gap with an analysis of the critical case of community-labor organizing in Chicago. We find that Chicago organizers engage in the boundary-crossing practice that observers have long recommended, by focusing on basic organizing and the recruitment of the economically marginalized and racial minorities; developing new collaborations across racial, territorial, and issue boundaries; and shifting daily practices to engage in political education, thereby connecting neighborhood struggles to structural problems and broader political coalitions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)585-620
Number of pages36
JournalSocial Service Review
Volume91
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

coalition
ideology
fordism
political education
structural problem
community
minority
labor
economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Crossing boundaries, building power : Chicago organizers embrace race, ideology, and coalition. / Lesniewski, Jacob; Doussard, Marc J.

In: Social Service Review, Vol. 91, No. 4, 12.2017, p. 585-620.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{214caa1e0b2249228db437fa13055eba,
title = "Crossing boundaries, building power: Chicago organizers embrace race, ideology, and coalition",
abstract = "Community organizing emerged as a coherent mode of intervention under conditions of postwar Fordism, a set of economic and political conditions that have changed substantially. The three critiques of classic organizing models, built by Saul Alinsky and subsequently adapted by others, point to the need to cross formal, informal, and conceptual boundaries. To date, little is known about whether, and to what end, organizers take up the proposals of these critiques. This article responds to this empirical gap with an analysis of the critical case of community-labor organizing in Chicago. We find that Chicago organizers engage in the boundary-crossing practice that observers have long recommended, by focusing on basic organizing and the recruitment of the economically marginalized and racial minorities; developing new collaborations across racial, territorial, and issue boundaries; and shifting daily practices to engage in political education, thereby connecting neighborhood struggles to structural problems and broader political coalitions.",
author = "Jacob Lesniewski and Doussard, {Marc J}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1086/694692",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "585--620",
journal = "Social Service Review",
issn = "0037-7961",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crossing boundaries, building power

T2 - Chicago organizers embrace race, ideology, and coalition

AU - Lesniewski, Jacob

AU - Doussard, Marc J

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Community organizing emerged as a coherent mode of intervention under conditions of postwar Fordism, a set of economic and political conditions that have changed substantially. The three critiques of classic organizing models, built by Saul Alinsky and subsequently adapted by others, point to the need to cross formal, informal, and conceptual boundaries. To date, little is known about whether, and to what end, organizers take up the proposals of these critiques. This article responds to this empirical gap with an analysis of the critical case of community-labor organizing in Chicago. We find that Chicago organizers engage in the boundary-crossing practice that observers have long recommended, by focusing on basic organizing and the recruitment of the economically marginalized and racial minorities; developing new collaborations across racial, territorial, and issue boundaries; and shifting daily practices to engage in political education, thereby connecting neighborhood struggles to structural problems and broader political coalitions.

AB - Community organizing emerged as a coherent mode of intervention under conditions of postwar Fordism, a set of economic and political conditions that have changed substantially. The three critiques of classic organizing models, built by Saul Alinsky and subsequently adapted by others, point to the need to cross formal, informal, and conceptual boundaries. To date, little is known about whether, and to what end, organizers take up the proposals of these critiques. This article responds to this empirical gap with an analysis of the critical case of community-labor organizing in Chicago. We find that Chicago organizers engage in the boundary-crossing practice that observers have long recommended, by focusing on basic organizing and the recruitment of the economically marginalized and racial minorities; developing new collaborations across racial, territorial, and issue boundaries; and shifting daily practices to engage in political education, thereby connecting neighborhood struggles to structural problems and broader political coalitions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036615065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036615065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/694692

DO - 10.1086/694692

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85036615065

VL - 91

SP - 585

EP - 620

JO - Social Service Review

JF - Social Service Review

SN - 0037-7961

IS - 4

ER -