Criticality and uncertainty assessment of assembly misloading in BWR transportation cask

Majdi I. Radaideh, Dean Price, Tomasz Kozlowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Misloading of a spent fuel assembly could occur during the loading process of transportation casks due to inaccurate burnup records or mistaken assembly identification. Therefore, criticality safety analysis is important for such conditions to ensure that the cask remains subcritical with a sufficient margin. Investigations of assembly misload in PWR spent fuel cask has been conducted in previous studies, a similar analysis is still needed for BWR casks because of the differences between them, such as operational conditions, assembly size, gadolinium rods presence, enrichment variation, and others. Consequently, a quantitative computational criticality safety analysis is conducted in this work for a variety of misloading conditions in a BWR burnup credit shipping cask (GBC-68). The uncertainty in keff estimation due to both nuclear data and statistical sampling has been quantified to ensure that keff uncertainty margin is within criticality bounds. The analysis has been carried out using different modules within the SCALE code system, namely, TRITON, KENO-V.a, and TSUNAMI-3D. The results demonstrate that BWR misloading has different trend than PWR because of the presence of gadolinium rods. Two sets of nuclides have been considered in this analysis to show the credit of the fission products: major actinides and major actinides plus fission products. The peak reactivity burnup is calculated to be 24 GWD/MTU. Assembly misload results illustrate that misloaded assemblies with burnup less than the peak reactivity burnup insert more reactivity than the fresh misloaded assemblies, which is the opposite for PWR where misloaded fresh assemblies insert more reactivity than the burned assemblies. The uncertainty analysis demonstrates that reactivity uncertainty is within 5% for most of the cases considered in this analysis. The estimation of probability of occurrence of misloading accidents is out of scope of this work and it is left as a future work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalAnnals of Nuclear Energy
Volume113
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Fission products
Gadolinium
Actinides
Spent fuels
Uncertainty
Uncertainty analysis
Freight transportation
Isotopes
Accidents
Sampling

Keywords

  • Assembly misload
  • BWR
  • Criticality safety
  • SCALE
  • Uncertainty quantification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering

Cite this

Criticality and uncertainty assessment of assembly misloading in BWR transportation cask. / Radaideh, Majdi I.; Price, Dean; Kozlowski, Tomasz.

In: Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 113, 03.2018, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{896ceb1c64d34cfdb3c26d77b80f96b7,
title = "Criticality and uncertainty assessment of assembly misloading in BWR transportation cask",
abstract = "Misloading of a spent fuel assembly could occur during the loading process of transportation casks due to inaccurate burnup records or mistaken assembly identification. Therefore, criticality safety analysis is important for such conditions to ensure that the cask remains subcritical with a sufficient margin. Investigations of assembly misload in PWR spent fuel cask has been conducted in previous studies, a similar analysis is still needed for BWR casks because of the differences between them, such as operational conditions, assembly size, gadolinium rods presence, enrichment variation, and others. Consequently, a quantitative computational criticality safety analysis is conducted in this work for a variety of misloading conditions in a BWR burnup credit shipping cask (GBC-68). The uncertainty in keff estimation due to both nuclear data and statistical sampling has been quantified to ensure that keff uncertainty margin is within criticality bounds. The analysis has been carried out using different modules within the SCALE code system, namely, TRITON, KENO-V.a, and TSUNAMI-3D. The results demonstrate that BWR misloading has different trend than PWR because of the presence of gadolinium rods. Two sets of nuclides have been considered in this analysis to show the credit of the fission products: major actinides and major actinides plus fission products. The peak reactivity burnup is calculated to be 24 GWD/MTU. Assembly misload results illustrate that misloaded assemblies with burnup less than the peak reactivity burnup insert more reactivity than the fresh misloaded assemblies, which is the opposite for PWR where misloaded fresh assemblies insert more reactivity than the burned assemblies. The uncertainty analysis demonstrates that reactivity uncertainty is within 5{\%} for most of the cases considered in this analysis. The estimation of probability of occurrence of misloading accidents is out of scope of this work and it is left as a future work.",
keywords = "Assembly misload, BWR, Criticality safety, SCALE, Uncertainty quantification",
author = "Radaideh, {Majdi I.} and Dean Price and Tomasz Kozlowski",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.anucene.2017.11.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Annals of Nuclear Energy",
issn = "0306-4549",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criticality and uncertainty assessment of assembly misloading in BWR transportation cask

AU - Radaideh, Majdi I.

AU - Price, Dean

AU - Kozlowski, Tomasz

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - Misloading of a spent fuel assembly could occur during the loading process of transportation casks due to inaccurate burnup records or mistaken assembly identification. Therefore, criticality safety analysis is important for such conditions to ensure that the cask remains subcritical with a sufficient margin. Investigations of assembly misload in PWR spent fuel cask has been conducted in previous studies, a similar analysis is still needed for BWR casks because of the differences between them, such as operational conditions, assembly size, gadolinium rods presence, enrichment variation, and others. Consequently, a quantitative computational criticality safety analysis is conducted in this work for a variety of misloading conditions in a BWR burnup credit shipping cask (GBC-68). The uncertainty in keff estimation due to both nuclear data and statistical sampling has been quantified to ensure that keff uncertainty margin is within criticality bounds. The analysis has been carried out using different modules within the SCALE code system, namely, TRITON, KENO-V.a, and TSUNAMI-3D. The results demonstrate that BWR misloading has different trend than PWR because of the presence of gadolinium rods. Two sets of nuclides have been considered in this analysis to show the credit of the fission products: major actinides and major actinides plus fission products. The peak reactivity burnup is calculated to be 24 GWD/MTU. Assembly misload results illustrate that misloaded assemblies with burnup less than the peak reactivity burnup insert more reactivity than the fresh misloaded assemblies, which is the opposite for PWR where misloaded fresh assemblies insert more reactivity than the burned assemblies. The uncertainty analysis demonstrates that reactivity uncertainty is within 5% for most of the cases considered in this analysis. The estimation of probability of occurrence of misloading accidents is out of scope of this work and it is left as a future work.

AB - Misloading of a spent fuel assembly could occur during the loading process of transportation casks due to inaccurate burnup records or mistaken assembly identification. Therefore, criticality safety analysis is important for such conditions to ensure that the cask remains subcritical with a sufficient margin. Investigations of assembly misload in PWR spent fuel cask has been conducted in previous studies, a similar analysis is still needed for BWR casks because of the differences between them, such as operational conditions, assembly size, gadolinium rods presence, enrichment variation, and others. Consequently, a quantitative computational criticality safety analysis is conducted in this work for a variety of misloading conditions in a BWR burnup credit shipping cask (GBC-68). The uncertainty in keff estimation due to both nuclear data and statistical sampling has been quantified to ensure that keff uncertainty margin is within criticality bounds. The analysis has been carried out using different modules within the SCALE code system, namely, TRITON, KENO-V.a, and TSUNAMI-3D. The results demonstrate that BWR misloading has different trend than PWR because of the presence of gadolinium rods. Two sets of nuclides have been considered in this analysis to show the credit of the fission products: major actinides and major actinides plus fission products. The peak reactivity burnup is calculated to be 24 GWD/MTU. Assembly misload results illustrate that misloaded assemblies with burnup less than the peak reactivity burnup insert more reactivity than the fresh misloaded assemblies, which is the opposite for PWR where misloaded fresh assemblies insert more reactivity than the burned assemblies. The uncertainty analysis demonstrates that reactivity uncertainty is within 5% for most of the cases considered in this analysis. The estimation of probability of occurrence of misloading accidents is out of scope of this work and it is left as a future work.

KW - Assembly misload

KW - BWR

KW - Criticality safety

KW - SCALE

KW - Uncertainty quantification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033388155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033388155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.11.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85033388155

VL - 113

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Annals of Nuclear Energy

JF - Annals of Nuclear Energy

SN - 0306-4549

ER -