TY - JOUR
T1 - Crisis Feminisms
T2 - How Convenient Forgetting, Feminist Ambivalence, and Racial Gaslighting Maintain the Status Quo
AU - Moussawi, Ghassan
AU - Reyes, Victoria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/11/15
Y1 - 2024/11/15
N2 - In this paper, we interrogate what are considered feminist issues for feminist sociologists, prodding us to expand our definition of ‘feminist sociology’ considering what we are still learning from global crises. We take our cue from Black, indigenous, women of color, and transnational feminisms, who highlight the importance of the self, center gender, sexuality, racialization, class, power and transnational processes, and have a commitment to feminist praxis. In doing so, we introduce the concept of ‘crisis feminisms’ as a theoretical tool to unpack how and why feminist practices and processes re-enact epistemic violence and maintain the status quo, despite rhetorically declaring otherwise. These processes, we argue, occur through three intertwined mechanisms: convenient forgetting, feminist ambivalence, and racial gaslighting. Documenting how these processes are enacted, we argue that radical potentialities for change are possible, but only if we embrace and practice what such feminist knowledges teach us.
AB - In this paper, we interrogate what are considered feminist issues for feminist sociologists, prodding us to expand our definition of ‘feminist sociology’ considering what we are still learning from global crises. We take our cue from Black, indigenous, women of color, and transnational feminisms, who highlight the importance of the self, center gender, sexuality, racialization, class, power and transnational processes, and have a commitment to feminist praxis. In doing so, we introduce the concept of ‘crisis feminisms’ as a theoretical tool to unpack how and why feminist practices and processes re-enact epistemic violence and maintain the status quo, despite rhetorically declaring otherwise. These processes, we argue, occur through three intertwined mechanisms: convenient forgetting, feminist ambivalence, and racial gaslighting. Documenting how these processes are enacted, we argue that radical potentialities for change are possible, but only if we embrace and practice what such feminist knowledges teach us.
KW - feminism
KW - identity politics
KW - intersectionality
KW - radical feminism
KW - social justice
KW - sociology of knowledge
KW - transnationalism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209406548&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85209406548&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/08969205241292752
DO - 10.1177/08969205241292752
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85209406548
SN - 0896-9205
JO - Critical Sociology
JF - Critical Sociology
ER -