Creative Nonfiction and the Academy: A Cautionary Tale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Since their inception, institutional review boards (IRBs), which use a biomedical model with which to evaluate cases, have continued to extend their reach, increasingly of late into the humanities. Although most humanists in the academy are probably not even aware of its existence, their local IRB could step in and demand that a writer' s project, it if involves the broadly defined human-subject research, be vetted through the board before approval be granted to proceed. Should the IRB determine that a writer has breached IRB protocol, the board has the authority to do what it will with the work, including attempting to stop its publication. Before such institutionalized oversight is allowed to continue to expand, much more work has to be done to assure that the process can be justly and rightly applied to the range of fields IRBs aspire to regulate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)202-206
Number of pages5
JournalQualitative Inquiry
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Keywords

  • Creative nonfiction
  • Institutional review boards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Creative Nonfiction and the Academy: A Cautionary Tale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this