Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cranial muscle homology across modern gnathostomes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Imprecise usage of terminology can lead to confusion when trying to compare cranial musculature between taxa from different higher-order groups. The present study aimed to present hypotheses of muscle homology between taxa from four modern gnathostome groups: Actinopterygii (Amia calva), Sarcopterygii (Latimeria chalumnae), Elasmobranchii (Squalus acanthias, Chlamydoselachus anguineus), and Holocephali (Hydrolagus colliei). Muscle homologies are hypothesized based on topological data taken from the anatomical literature and supplemented by new observations of Hydrolagus colliei. Hypothesized muscle groups are tested for congruence against accepted gnathostome phylogeny. From these data, eight muscle groups are identified that are unambiguously homologous across all taxa examined. Four more muscle groups are found to be homologous across a majority of the taxa. Twelve muscle groups are hypothesized to be basal across all gnathostomes. A muscle in Hydrolagus previously called both a geniohyoideus and interhyoideus is here renamed 'mandibulohyoideus' to reflect its apomorphic condition. The presence of coracomandibular muscles in all groups supports the hypothesis that basal jaw depression systems in gnathostomes were not linked to hyoid movement, but independently operated by this muscle. The study also offers new insight into muscle reconstruction in fossil groups (Placodermi).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-216
Number of pages22
JournalBiological Journal of the Linnean Society
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Holocephalans
  • Nomenclature
  • Skull musculature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cranial muscle homology across modern gnathostomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this