Countering false beliefs: An analysis of the evidence and recommendations of best practices for the retraction and correction of scientific misinformation

Man Pui Sally Chan, Christopher Jones, Dolores Albarracin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Although false beliefs about science are at the core of theory and practice in the field of scientific communication, correction and retraction of misinformation entail a complex and difficult process. This chapter first provides a review of trends in scientific retraction and correction notes failures in the fundamental communicative function of signaling that a published finding has been invalidated. It describes the recent practical communication developments that are increasing the transparency and visibility of retractions and corrections of fraudulent or incorrect scientific findings and examines the final barrier to correction of misbelief: the continued influence effect. The chapter reviews the results of a meta- analysis of the continued influence effect and present psychology- based recommendations in the form of decision trees to guide the work of scientists and practitioners and provides eight best practice recommendations for science communication scholars and practitioners as they continue their battle against misinformation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages341-350
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9780190497620
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Communication
Decision Trees
Meta-Analysis
Psychology

Keywords

  • Beliefs
  • Continued influence
  • Correction
  • Meta- analysis
  • Misinformation
  • Retraction
  • Science communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Countering false beliefs : An analysis of the evidence and recommendations of best practices for the retraction and correction of scientific misinformation. / Chan, Man Pui Sally; Jones, Christopher; Albarracin, Dolores.

The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication. Oxford University Press, 2017. p. 341-350.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Chan, Man Pui Sally ; Jones, Christopher ; Albarracin, Dolores. / Countering false beliefs : An analysis of the evidence and recommendations of best practices for the retraction and correction of scientific misinformation. The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication. Oxford University Press, 2017. pp. 341-350
@inbook{64dcf71210f74fd3915f75d7ace4ca28,
title = "Countering false beliefs: An analysis of the evidence and recommendations of best practices for the retraction and correction of scientific misinformation",
abstract = "Although false beliefs about science are at the core of theory and practice in the field of scientific communication, correction and retraction of misinformation entail a complex and difficult process. This chapter first provides a review of trends in scientific retraction and correction notes failures in the fundamental communicative function of signaling that a published finding has been invalidated. It describes the recent practical communication developments that are increasing the transparency and visibility of retractions and corrections of fraudulent or incorrect scientific findings and examines the final barrier to correction of misbelief: the continued influence effect. The chapter reviews the results of a meta- analysis of the continued influence effect and present psychology- based recommendations in the form of decision trees to guide the work of scientists and practitioners and provides eight best practice recommendations for science communication scholars and practitioners as they continue their battle against misinformation.",
keywords = "Beliefs, Continued influence, Correction, Meta- analysis, Misinformation, Retraction, Science communication",
author = "Chan, {Man Pui Sally} and Christopher Jones and Dolores Albarracin",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.37",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "341--350",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Countering false beliefs

T2 - An analysis of the evidence and recommendations of best practices for the retraction and correction of scientific misinformation

AU - Chan, Man Pui Sally

AU - Jones, Christopher

AU - Albarracin, Dolores

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Although false beliefs about science are at the core of theory and practice in the field of scientific communication, correction and retraction of misinformation entail a complex and difficult process. This chapter first provides a review of trends in scientific retraction and correction notes failures in the fundamental communicative function of signaling that a published finding has been invalidated. It describes the recent practical communication developments that are increasing the transparency and visibility of retractions and corrections of fraudulent or incorrect scientific findings and examines the final barrier to correction of misbelief: the continued influence effect. The chapter reviews the results of a meta- analysis of the continued influence effect and present psychology- based recommendations in the form of decision trees to guide the work of scientists and practitioners and provides eight best practice recommendations for science communication scholars and practitioners as they continue their battle against misinformation.

AB - Although false beliefs about science are at the core of theory and practice in the field of scientific communication, correction and retraction of misinformation entail a complex and difficult process. This chapter first provides a review of trends in scientific retraction and correction notes failures in the fundamental communicative function of signaling that a published finding has been invalidated. It describes the recent practical communication developments that are increasing the transparency and visibility of retractions and corrections of fraudulent or incorrect scientific findings and examines the final barrier to correction of misbelief: the continued influence effect. The chapter reviews the results of a meta- analysis of the continued influence effect and present psychology- based recommendations in the form of decision trees to guide the work of scientists and practitioners and provides eight best practice recommendations for science communication scholars and practitioners as they continue their battle against misinformation.

KW - Beliefs

KW - Continued influence

KW - Correction

KW - Meta- analysis

KW - Misinformation

KW - Retraction

KW - Science communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054184733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054184733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.37

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.37

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85054184733

SP - 341

EP - 350

BT - The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -