TY - JOUR
T1 - Counterfactual Analysis and Inference With Nonstationary Data
AU - Masini, Ricardo
AU - Medeiros, Marcelo C.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research of the second author is partially supported by CNPq and CAPES.
Funding Information:
The research of the second author is partially supported by CNPq and CAPES. This article is a major extension of a previous article titled ?The Perils of Counterfactual Analysis with Integrated Processes,? which is co-authored with Carlos V. Carvalho. We wish to deeply thank our former co-author Carlos Carvalho for pointing us to this research agenda and for inspiring discussions. We also wish to thank the participants at the 2017 NBER-NSF Time Series Conference, the 2017 Meeting of the Brazilian Econometric Society (SBE), the Workshop Rio-S?o Paulo of Econometrics, and the 2017 Conference of the International Association for Applied Econometrics for helpful comments. Finally, we wish to thank the co-editor, Jianqing Fan, the associate editor, and three anonymous referees for great comments and suggestions. Nevertheless, any mistakes in the article are our own. The research of the second author is partially supported by CNPq and CAPES.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Statistical Association.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Recently, there has been growing interest in developing econometric tools to conduct counterfactual analysis with aggregate data when a single “treated” unit suffers an intervention, such as a policy change, and there is no obvious control group. Usually, the proposed methods are based on the construction of an artificial/synthetic counterfactual from a pool of “untreated” peers, organized in a panel data structure. In this article, we investigate the consequences of applying such methodologies when the data comprise integrated processes of order 1, I(1), or are trend-stationary. We find that for I(1) processes without a cointegrating relationship (spurious case) the estimator of the effects of the intervention diverges, regardless of its existence. Although spurious regression is a well-known concept in time-series econometrics, they have been ignored in most of the literature on counterfactual estimation based on artificial/synthetic controls. For the case when at least one cointegration relationship exists, we have consistent estimators for the intervention effect albeit with a nonstandard distribution. Finally, we discuss a test based on resampling which can be applied when there is at least one cointegration relationship or when the data are trend-stationary.
AB - Recently, there has been growing interest in developing econometric tools to conduct counterfactual analysis with aggregate data when a single “treated” unit suffers an intervention, such as a policy change, and there is no obvious control group. Usually, the proposed methods are based on the construction of an artificial/synthetic counterfactual from a pool of “untreated” peers, organized in a panel data structure. In this article, we investigate the consequences of applying such methodologies when the data comprise integrated processes of order 1, I(1), or are trend-stationary. We find that for I(1) processes without a cointegrating relationship (spurious case) the estimator of the effects of the intervention diverges, regardless of its existence. Although spurious regression is a well-known concept in time-series econometrics, they have been ignored in most of the literature on counterfactual estimation based on artificial/synthetic controls. For the case when at least one cointegration relationship exists, we have consistent estimators for the intervention effect albeit with a nonstandard distribution. Finally, we discuss a test based on resampling which can be applied when there is at least one cointegration relationship or when the data are trend-stationary.
KW - ArCo
KW - Cointegration
KW - Counterfactual analysis
KW - Nonstationarity
KW - Policy evaluation
KW - Synthetic control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090444085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090444085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07350015.2020.1799814
DO - 10.1080/07350015.2020.1799814
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85090444085
SN - 0735-0015
VL - 40
SP - 227
EP - 239
JO - Journal of Business and Economic Statistics
JF - Journal of Business and Economic Statistics
IS - 1
ER -