Abstract
We investigate the strategies used by 64 advanced secondary mathematics students to identify whether a given pair of polynomial representations (graphs, tables, or equations) corresponded to the same function on an assessment of coordinating representations. Participants also completed assessments of domain-related knowledge and background skills. Cluster analysis of strategies by representation pair revealed patterns in the participants' strategy use. Two clusters were identifiable on tasks that required matching equations to graphs and graphs to tables. We identified overlap between these two clusters, suggesting that while the representation pair influenced strategy choice, there was also a general distinction between students who used more and less sophisticated strategies. However, students who used more sophisticated coordination strategies were similar to the others on measures of domain-specific knowledge or background skills. We consider implications for future investigations testing interventions to promote coordinating representations.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 131-141 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Learning and Instruction |
Volume | 49 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 1 2017 |
Keywords
- Calculus
- Cluster analysis
- Coordinating multiple representations
- Strategy use
- Think-aloud
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Developmental and Educational Psychology