TY - GEN
T1 - Convergence to Lexicographically Optimal Base in a (Contra)Polymatroid and Applications to Densest Subgraph and Tree Packing
AU - Harb, Elfarouk
AU - Quanrud, Kent
AU - Chekuri, Chandra
N1 - Funding Elfarouk Harb: Supported in part by NSF grants CCF-2028861 and CCF-1910149. Kent Quanrud: Supported in part by NSF grant CCF-2129816. Chandra Chekuri: Supported in part by NSF grants CCF-2028861 and CCF-1910149.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Boob et al. [7] described an iterative peeling algorithm called Greedy++ for the Densest Subgraph Problem (DSG) and conjectured that it converges to an optimum solution. Chekuri, Qaunrud and Torres [10] extended the algorithm to supermodular density problems (of which DSG is a special case) and proved that the resulting algorithm Super-Greedy++ (and hence also Greedy++) converges. In this paper we revisit the convergence proof and provide a different perspective. This is done via a connection to Fujishige’s quadratic program for finding a lexicographically optimal base in a (contra) polymatroid [18], and a noisy version of the Frank-Wolfe method from convex optimization [17, 25]. This yields a simpler convergence proof, and also shows a stronger property that Super-Greedy++ converges to the optimal dense decomposition vector, answering a question raised in Harb et al. [24]. A second contribution of the paper is to understand Thorup’s work on ideal tree packing and greedy tree packing [46, 47] via the Frank-Wolfe algorithm applied to find a lexicographically optimum base in the graphic matroid. This yields a simpler and transparent proof. The two results appear disparate but are unified via Fujishige’s result and convex optimization.
AB - Boob et al. [7] described an iterative peeling algorithm called Greedy++ for the Densest Subgraph Problem (DSG) and conjectured that it converges to an optimum solution. Chekuri, Qaunrud and Torres [10] extended the algorithm to supermodular density problems (of which DSG is a special case) and proved that the resulting algorithm Super-Greedy++ (and hence also Greedy++) converges. In this paper we revisit the convergence proof and provide a different perspective. This is done via a connection to Fujishige’s quadratic program for finding a lexicographically optimal base in a (contra) polymatroid [18], and a noisy version of the Frank-Wolfe method from convex optimization [17, 25]. This yields a simpler convergence proof, and also shows a stronger property that Super-Greedy++ converges to the optimal dense decomposition vector, answering a question raised in Harb et al. [24]. A second contribution of the paper is to understand Thorup’s work on ideal tree packing and greedy tree packing [46, 47] via the Frank-Wolfe algorithm applied to find a lexicographically optimum base in the graphic matroid. This yields a simpler and transparent proof. The two results appear disparate but are unified via Fujishige’s result and convex optimization.
KW - Polymatroid
KW - densest subgraph
KW - lexicographically optimum base
KW - tree packing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85173541336
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85173541336#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2023.56
DO - 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2023.56
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85173541336
T3 - Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
BT - 31st Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, ESA 2023
A2 - Li Gortz, Inge
A2 - Farach-Colton, Martin
A2 - Puglisi, Simon J.
A2 - Herman, Grzegorz
PB - Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
T2 - 31st Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, ESA 2023
Y2 - 4 September 2023 through 6 September 2023
ER -