TY - CHAP
T1 - Contracting in the Biofuel Sector
AU - Du, Xiaoxue
AU - Khanna, Madhu
AU - Lu, Liang
AU - Yang, Xi
AU - Zilberman, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - To accommodate rapid technological change in agriculture, contract farming has emerged as a market response to manage and share risks along the supply chain. Contract farming strengthens vertical coordination for producers and processors motivated by desire to decrease randomness, overcome credit and risk constraints, assure production targets, and address environmental considerations. Using contract theory perspective, this paper shows why multiple contract forms exist to address different types of risk, market size and maturity, and other constraints. Our findings suggest that, in the case of biofuels, contract design depends on land quality, output prices and markets, farmers’ risk preference, and other constraints. In establishing a refinery, the decision-maker must determine the size of refinery, quantity of in-house feedstock production, and strategy for purchasing additional feedstock. When facility capacity exceeds in-house production, the processor needs to rely on external feedstock. Processors and producers with higher land quality are shown to benefit from vertical integration, while lower land quality should result in conversion to biofuel production due to lower opportunity cost. As second generation feedstock production grows and matures, policies must consider contract design, technology adoption, and vertical integration.
AB - To accommodate rapid technological change in agriculture, contract farming has emerged as a market response to manage and share risks along the supply chain. Contract farming strengthens vertical coordination for producers and processors motivated by desire to decrease randomness, overcome credit and risk constraints, assure production targets, and address environmental considerations. Using contract theory perspective, this paper shows why multiple contract forms exist to address different types of risk, market size and maturity, and other constraints. Our findings suggest that, in the case of biofuels, contract design depends on land quality, output prices and markets, farmers’ risk preference, and other constraints. In establishing a refinery, the decision-maker must determine the size of refinery, quantity of in-house feedstock production, and strategy for purchasing additional feedstock. When facility capacity exceeds in-house production, the processor needs to rely on external feedstock. Processors and producers with higher land quality are shown to benefit from vertical integration, while lower land quality should result in conversion to biofuel production due to lower opportunity cost. As second generation feedstock production grows and matures, policies must consider contract design, technology adoption, and vertical integration.
KW - Biofuel
KW - Contract farming
KW - Energy crop
KW - Mechanism design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141370408&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85141370408&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4939-6906-7_16
DO - 10.1007/978-1-4939-6906-7_16
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85141370408
T3 - Natural Resource Management and Policy
SP - 401
EP - 425
BT - Natural Resource Management and Policy
PB - Springer
ER -