TY - JOUR
T1 - Continuous-scale physical functional performance in healthy older adults
T2 - A validation study
AU - Cress, M. Elaine
AU - Buchner, David M.
AU - Questad, Kent A.
AU - Esselman, Peter C.
AU - DeLateur, Barbara J.
AU - Schwartz, Robert S.
N1 - Funding Information:
From the Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine (Dr. Cress), the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (Drs. Questad, Essel-man), and the Departdent of Health Services and Community Medicine (Dr. Buchner), University of Washington, Seattle; the Northwest HSR&D Field Program, Seattle Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Dr. Buchner); and the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University (Dr. delateur), Baltimore, MD. Submitted for publication November 9, 1995. Accepted in revised form April 17, 1996. Sunoorted bv National Institutes of Health srant 1 R29 AG10267. Centers for Dises;sk Control grant U48-CCUO09654, Natiokl Institutes of Heal& grant 1 R01 AG10853, and National Institutes of Health grant R010943. Presented in part at the 1994 annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Atlanta. GA. No commercial oar& havine a direct tinancial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated. Reprint requests to M. Elaine Cress, PhD, University of Washington, Box 358852, Seattle, WA 98195. 0 1996 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 0003-9993/96/7712-3762$3.00/O
PY - 1996/12
Y1 - 1996/12
N2 - The continuous-scale physical functional performance test (CS-PFP) is an original instrument designed to provide a comprehensive; in-depth measure of physical function that reflects abilities in several separate physical domains. It is based on a concept of physical function as the integration of physiological capacity, physical performance, and psychosocial factors. Setting: The test was administered under standard conditions in a hospital facility with a neighborhood setting. The CS-PFP consists of a battery of 15 everyday tasks, ranging from easy to demanding, that sample the physical domains of upper and lower body strength, upper flexibility, balance and coordination, and endurance. Participants are told to work safely but at maximal effort, and physical functional performance was measured as weight, time, or distance. Scores were standardized and scaled 0 to 12. The test yields a total score and separate physical domain scores. Design: The CS- PFP was evaluated using 148 older adults-78 community dwellers, 31 long- term care facility residents living independently, and 39 residents with some dependence. Main Outcome Measures: Maximal physical performance assessment included measures of maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max), isokinetic strength, range of motion, gait, and balance. Psychosocial factors were measured as self-defined health status using the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), self-perceived function using the Health Survey (SF36), and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL). Results: IADL scores were not significantly different among the groups. Test-retest correlations ranged from .84 to .97 and inter-rater reliability from .92 to .99 for the CS-PFP total and 5 domains. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α, .74 to .97). Both total and individual domain CS-PFP scores were significantly different for the three groups of study participants, increasing with higher levels of independence, supporting construct validity. CS-PFP domain scores were significantly correlated with measures of maximal physical performance (V̇O2max, strength, etc) and with physical but not emotional aspects of self-perceived function. Conclusions: The CS- PFP is a valid, reliable measure of physical function, applicable to a wide range of functional levels, and having minimal floor and ceiling effect. The total and physical domains may be used to evaluate, discriminate, and predict physical functional performance for both research and clinical purposes.
AB - The continuous-scale physical functional performance test (CS-PFP) is an original instrument designed to provide a comprehensive; in-depth measure of physical function that reflects abilities in several separate physical domains. It is based on a concept of physical function as the integration of physiological capacity, physical performance, and psychosocial factors. Setting: The test was administered under standard conditions in a hospital facility with a neighborhood setting. The CS-PFP consists of a battery of 15 everyday tasks, ranging from easy to demanding, that sample the physical domains of upper and lower body strength, upper flexibility, balance and coordination, and endurance. Participants are told to work safely but at maximal effort, and physical functional performance was measured as weight, time, or distance. Scores were standardized and scaled 0 to 12. The test yields a total score and separate physical domain scores. Design: The CS- PFP was evaluated using 148 older adults-78 community dwellers, 31 long- term care facility residents living independently, and 39 residents with some dependence. Main Outcome Measures: Maximal physical performance assessment included measures of maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max), isokinetic strength, range of motion, gait, and balance. Psychosocial factors were measured as self-defined health status using the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), self-perceived function using the Health Survey (SF36), and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL). Results: IADL scores were not significantly different among the groups. Test-retest correlations ranged from .84 to .97 and inter-rater reliability from .92 to .99 for the CS-PFP total and 5 domains. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α, .74 to .97). Both total and individual domain CS-PFP scores were significantly different for the three groups of study participants, increasing with higher levels of independence, supporting construct validity. CS-PFP domain scores were significantly correlated with measures of maximal physical performance (V̇O2max, strength, etc) and with physical but not emotional aspects of self-perceived function. Conclusions: The CS- PFP is a valid, reliable measure of physical function, applicable to a wide range of functional levels, and having minimal floor and ceiling effect. The total and physical domains may be used to evaluate, discriminate, and predict physical functional performance for both research and clinical purposes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030464970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030464970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90187-2
DO - 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90187-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 8976306
AN - SCOPUS:0030464970
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 77
SP - 1243
EP - 1250
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 12
ER -