Contextualizing Neuro-Collaborations: Reflections on a transdisciplinary fMRI lie detection experiment

Melissa M. Littlefield, Des Fitzgerald, Kasper Knudsen, James Tonks, Martin J. Dietz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent neuroscience initiatives (including the E.U.'s Human Brain Project and the U.S.'s BRAIN Initiative) have reinvigorated discussions about the possibilities for transdisciplinary collaboration between the neurosciences, the social sciences, and the humanities. As STS scholars have argued for decades, however, such interand transdisciplinary collaborations are potentially fraught with tensions between researchers. This essay build on such claims by arguing that the tensions of transdisciplinary research also exist within researchers' own experiences of working between disciplines-a phenomenon that we call "disciplinary double consciousness" (DDC). Building on previous work that has characterized similar spaces (and especially on the Critical Neuroscience literature), we argue that "neuro-collaborations" inevitably engage researchers in DDC-a phenomenon that allows us to explore the useful dissonance that researchers can experience when working between a home discipline and a secondary discipline. Our case study is a five-year research project in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) lie detection involving a transdisciplinary research team made up of social scientists, a neuroscientist, and a humanist. In addition to theorizing neuro-collaborations from the inside-out, this essay presents practical suggestions for developing transdisciplinary infrastructures that could support future neuro-collaborations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number149
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume8
Issue numberMAR
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 31 2014

Fingerprint

Lie Detection
Neurosciences
Research Personnel
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Consciousness
Research
Social Sciences
Brain

Keywords

  • Critical neuroscience
  • Disciplinary double consciousness
  • Neuro-collaboration
  • Transdisciplinarity
  • fMRI lie detection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Contextualizing Neuro-Collaborations : Reflections on a transdisciplinary fMRI lie detection experiment. / Littlefield, Melissa M.; Fitzgerald, Des; Knudsen, Kasper; Tonks, James; Dietz, Martin J.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 8, No. MAR, 149, 31.03.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{93c4b2dbf9bb4bf9a3dab38dd0530f83,
title = "Contextualizing Neuro-Collaborations: Reflections on a transdisciplinary fMRI lie detection experiment",
abstract = "Recent neuroscience initiatives (including the E.U.'s Human Brain Project and the U.S.'s BRAIN Initiative) have reinvigorated discussions about the possibilities for transdisciplinary collaboration between the neurosciences, the social sciences, and the humanities. As STS scholars have argued for decades, however, such interand transdisciplinary collaborations are potentially fraught with tensions between researchers. This essay build on such claims by arguing that the tensions of transdisciplinary research also exist within researchers' own experiences of working between disciplines-a phenomenon that we call {"}disciplinary double consciousness{"} (DDC). Building on previous work that has characterized similar spaces (and especially on the Critical Neuroscience literature), we argue that {"}neuro-collaborations{"} inevitably engage researchers in DDC-a phenomenon that allows us to explore the useful dissonance that researchers can experience when working between a home discipline and a secondary discipline. Our case study is a five-year research project in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) lie detection involving a transdisciplinary research team made up of social scientists, a neuroscientist, and a humanist. In addition to theorizing neuro-collaborations from the inside-out, this essay presents practical suggestions for developing transdisciplinary infrastructures that could support future neuro-collaborations.",
keywords = "Critical neuroscience, Disciplinary double consciousness, Neuro-collaboration, Transdisciplinarity, fMRI lie detection",
author = "Littlefield, {Melissa M.} and Des Fitzgerald and Kasper Knudsen and James Tonks and Dietz, {Martin J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2014.00149",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "MAR",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contextualizing Neuro-Collaborations

T2 - Reflections on a transdisciplinary fMRI lie detection experiment

AU - Littlefield, Melissa M.

AU - Fitzgerald, Des

AU - Knudsen, Kasper

AU - Tonks, James

AU - Dietz, Martin J.

PY - 2014/3/31

Y1 - 2014/3/31

N2 - Recent neuroscience initiatives (including the E.U.'s Human Brain Project and the U.S.'s BRAIN Initiative) have reinvigorated discussions about the possibilities for transdisciplinary collaboration between the neurosciences, the social sciences, and the humanities. As STS scholars have argued for decades, however, such interand transdisciplinary collaborations are potentially fraught with tensions between researchers. This essay build on such claims by arguing that the tensions of transdisciplinary research also exist within researchers' own experiences of working between disciplines-a phenomenon that we call "disciplinary double consciousness" (DDC). Building on previous work that has characterized similar spaces (and especially on the Critical Neuroscience literature), we argue that "neuro-collaborations" inevitably engage researchers in DDC-a phenomenon that allows us to explore the useful dissonance that researchers can experience when working between a home discipline and a secondary discipline. Our case study is a five-year research project in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) lie detection involving a transdisciplinary research team made up of social scientists, a neuroscientist, and a humanist. In addition to theorizing neuro-collaborations from the inside-out, this essay presents practical suggestions for developing transdisciplinary infrastructures that could support future neuro-collaborations.

AB - Recent neuroscience initiatives (including the E.U.'s Human Brain Project and the U.S.'s BRAIN Initiative) have reinvigorated discussions about the possibilities for transdisciplinary collaboration between the neurosciences, the social sciences, and the humanities. As STS scholars have argued for decades, however, such interand transdisciplinary collaborations are potentially fraught with tensions between researchers. This essay build on such claims by arguing that the tensions of transdisciplinary research also exist within researchers' own experiences of working between disciplines-a phenomenon that we call "disciplinary double consciousness" (DDC). Building on previous work that has characterized similar spaces (and especially on the Critical Neuroscience literature), we argue that "neuro-collaborations" inevitably engage researchers in DDC-a phenomenon that allows us to explore the useful dissonance that researchers can experience when working between a home discipline and a secondary discipline. Our case study is a five-year research project in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) lie detection involving a transdisciplinary research team made up of social scientists, a neuroscientist, and a humanist. In addition to theorizing neuro-collaborations from the inside-out, this essay presents practical suggestions for developing transdisciplinary infrastructures that could support future neuro-collaborations.

KW - Critical neuroscience

KW - Disciplinary double consciousness

KW - Neuro-collaboration

KW - Transdisciplinarity

KW - fMRI lie detection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897431578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897431578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00149

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00149

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84897431578

VL - 8

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

IS - MAR

M1 - 149

ER -