Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This paper argues that truth values of sentences containing predicates of "personal taste" such as fun or tasty must be relativized to individuals. This relativization is of truth value only, and does not involve a relativization of semantic content: If you say roller coasters are fun, and I say they are not, I am negating the same content which you assert, and directly contradicting you. Nonetheless, both our utterances can be true (relative to their separate contexts). A formal semantic theory is presented which gives this result by introducing an individual index, analogous to the world and time indices commonly used, and by treating the pragmatic context as supplying a particular value for this index. The context supplies this value in the derivation of truth values from content, not in the derivation of content from character. Predicates of personal taste therefore display a kind of contextual variation in interpretation which is unlike the familiar variation exhibited by pronouns and other indexicals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)643-686
Number of pages44
JournalLinguistics and Philosophy
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2005


  • artificial intelligence
  • contextual variation
  • Computational linguistics
  • semantic theory
  • semantic content

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Linguistics and Language


Dive into the research topics of 'Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this